Robust Detection, Assocation, and Localization of Vehicle Lights: A Context-Based Cascaded CNN Approach and Evaluations

AI-generated keywords: Vehicle Lights Detection Localization Cascaded CNN Autonomous Driving

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper addresses the importance of vehicle light detection in autonomous driving tasks.
  • The authors experiment with different CNN architectures, data augmentation techniques, and contextual preprocessing methods to improve accuracy and reduce confusion with surrounding vehicles.
  • The model is evaluated on the LISA Lights dataset, allowing for thorough assessment of performance across various lighting conditions and shapes of vehicle lights.
  • An average distance error from the ground truth corner of 5.09 pixels is reported, corresponding to approximately 17.24% of the size of the vehicle light on average.
  • The proposed method shows promising results in accurately detecting and localizing vehicle lights.
  • The authors suggest integrating this model into a pipeline that includes both vehicle detection and vehicle light center detection.
  • This research contributes to enhancing safety in autonomous driving systems by improving understanding and prediction of vehicles' light states during critical maneuvers.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Akshay Gopalkrishnan, Ross Greer, Maitrayee Keskar, Mohan Trivedi

Abstract: Vehicle light detection is required for important downstream safe autonomous driving tasks, such as predicting a vehicle's light state to determine if the vehicle is making a lane change or turning. Currently, many vehicle light detectors use single-stage detectors which predict bounding boxes to identify a vehicle light, in a manner decoupled from vehicle instances. In this paper, we present a method for detecting a vehicle light given an upstream vehicle detection and approximation of a visible light's center. Our method predicts four approximate corners associated with each vehicle light. We experiment with CNN architectures, data augmentation, and contextual preprocessing methods designed to reduce surrounding-vehicle confusion. We achieve an average distance error from the ground truth corner of 5.09 pixels, about 17.24% of the size of the vehicle light on average. We train and evaluate our model on the LISA Lights dataset, allowing us to thoroughly evaluate our vehicle light corner detection model on a large variety of vehicle light shapes and lighting conditions. We propose that this model can be integrated into a pipeline with vehicle detection and vehicle light center detection to make a fully-formed vehicle light detection network, valuable to identifying trajectory-informative signals in driving scenes.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.14571v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Robust Detection, Association, and Localization of Vehicle Lights: A Context-Based Cascaded CNN Approach and Evaluations" addresses the importance of vehicle light detection in autonomous driving tasks. To improve accuracy and reduce confusion with surrounding vehicles, the authors experiment with different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, data augmentation techniques, and contextual preprocessing methods. The authors evaluate their model on the LISA Lights dataset which allows them to thoroughly assess its performance across various lighting conditions and shapes of vehicle lights. They report an average distance error from the ground truth corner of 5.09 pixels which corresponds to approximately 17.24% of the size of the vehicle light on average. Overall, the proposed method shows promising results in detecting and localizing vehicle lights accurately. The authors suggest integrating this model into a pipeline that includes both vehicle detection and vehicle light center detection to create a comprehensive network for identifying trajectory-informative signals in driving scenes. This research contributes to enhancing safety in autonomous driving systems by improving the understanding and prediction of vehicles' light states during critical maneuvers like lane changes or turns.
Created on 16 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.