z-GAL -- A NOEMA spectroscopic redshift survey of bright Herschel galaxies: [I] Overview
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The z-GAL survey used the IRAM NOEMA interferometer to measure redshifts of 126 bright galaxies detected in Herschel surveys
- 124 of these galaxies have reliable spectroscopic redshifts estimated from scans of the 3 and 2-mm bands
- Together with the Pilot Programme, a total of 135 bright Herschel-selected galaxies have precise redshifts
- Majority of emission lines detected are from 12CO, with some sources also showing [CI] and H2O emission lines
- Spectroscopic redshifts range from 0.8 < z < 6.55, with a median value of z=2.56 +/- 0.10
- Line widths generally large, with mean full width at half maximum Delta(V) of 590 +/-25 km/s
- Most sources appear unresolved or barely resolved on scales of 2 to 3 arcsec
- Some fields reveal double or multiple sources and even sources at different redshifts, resulting in a total count of 165 individual sources with robust spectroscopic redshifts
- The z-GAL survey provides an overview of observed properties such as emission lines and derived spectroscopic redshifts
Authors: P. Cox, R. Neri, S. Berta, D. Ismail, F. Stanley, A. Young, S. Jin, T. Bakx, A. Beelen, H. Dannerbauer, M. Krips, M. Lehnert, A. Omont, D. A. Riechers, A. J. Baker, G. Bendo, E. Borsato, V. Buat, K. Butler, N. Chartab, A. Cooray, S. Dye, S. Eales, R. Gavazzi, D. Hughes, R. Ivison, B. M. Jones, L. Marchetti, H. Messias, A. Nanni, M. Negrello, I. Perez-Fournon, S. Serjeant, S. Urquhart, C. Vlahakis, A. Weiss, P. van der Werf, C. Yang
Abstract: (Abridged) Using the IRAM NOEMA interferometer, we measures the redshifts of 126 bright galaxies detected in the Herschel H-ATLAS, HeLMS, and HerS surveys. We report reliable spectroscopic redshifts for a total of 124 of the Herschel-selected galaxies. The redshifts are estimated from scans of the 3 and 2-mm bands (and, in one case, the 1-mm band) and are based on the detection of at least two emission lines. Together with the Pilot Programme (Neri et al. 2020), including spectroscopic redshifts of 11 sources, our survey has derived precise redshifts for 135 bright Herschel-selected galaxies, making it the largest sample of high-z galaxies with robust redshifts to date. Most emission lines detected are from 12CO (mainly from J=2-1 to 5-4), with some sources seen in [CI] and H2O emission lines. The spectroscopic redshifts are in the range 0.8<z<6.55 with a median value of z=2.56 +/- 0.10. The line widths of the sources are large, with a mean value for the full width at half maximum Delta(V) of 590 +/- 25 km/s and with 35% of the sources having widths of 700 km/s < Delta(V) < 1800 km/s. Most of the sources are unresolved or barely resolved on scales of 2 to 3 arcsec (or linear sizes of 15-25 kpc, unlensed). Some fields reveal double or multiple sources and, in some cases, sources at different redshifts. Taking these sources into account, there are, in total, 165 individual sources with robust spectroscopic redshifts, including lensed galaxies, binary systems, and over-densities. We present an overview of the z-GAL survey and provide the observed properties of the emission lines, the derived spectroscopic redshifts, and an atlas of the entire sample. The data presented here will serve as a foundation for the other z-GAL papers in this series reporting on the dust emission, the molecular and atomic gas properties, and a detailed analysis of the nature of the sources.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.