Constraints on Cosmological Models with Gamma-Ray Bursts in Cosmology-Independent Way

AI-generated keywords: Cosmology Gamma-Ray Bursts Amati Relation Hubble Data Flat Cosmological Models

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Hanbei Xie et al. present a method to constrain cosmological models using gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
  • They use a sample of 221 GRBs, including 49 from the Fermi catalog with the Amati relation
  • The authors focus on two flat cosmological models: flat ΛCDM and flat wCDM
  • Constraints are obtained by considering 182 GRBs within the redshift range $0.8\le z\le8.2$ in the Hubble diagram
  • The latest observational Hubble data (OHD) is incorporated through the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method
  • For the flat ΛCDM model, they find $\Omega_{\rm m}$ = $0.348^{+0.048}_{-0.066}$ and $h$ = $0.680^{+0.029}_{-0.029}$
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hanbei Xie, Xiaodong Nong, Bin Zhang, Huifeng Wang, Zihao Li, Nan Liang

arXiv: 2307.16467v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
7 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2211.02473

Abstract: In this paper, we present a cosmology-independent method to constrain cosmological models from the latest 221 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) sample, including 49 GRBs from Fermi catalog with the Amati relation (the $E_{\rm p}$-${E}_{\rm iso}$ correlation), which calibrated by using a Gaussian process from the Pantheon+ type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) sample. With 182 GRBs at $0.8\le z\le8.2$ in the Hubble diagram and the latest observational Hubble data (OHD) by the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, we obtained $\Omega_{\rm m}$ = $0.348^{+0.048}_{-0.066}$ and $h$ = $0.680^{+0.029}_{-0.029}$ for the flat $\Lambda$CDM model, and $\Omega_{\rm m}$ = $0.318^{+0.067}_{-0.059}$, $h$ = $0.704^{+0.055}_{-0.068}$, $w$ = $-1.21^{+0.32}_{-0.67}$ for the flat $w$CDM model. These results are consistent with those in which the coefficients of the Amati relation and the cosmological parameters fitted simultaneously.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.16467v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Constraints on Cosmological Models with Gamma-Ray Bursts in Cosmology-Independent Way," Hanbei Xie, Xiaodong Nong, Bin Zhang, Huifeng Wang, Zihao Li, and Nan Liang present a novel method to constrain cosmological models using gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). They utilize the latest sample of 221 GRBs, including 49 from the Fermi catalog with the Amati relation (the $E_{\rm p}$-${E}_{\rm iso}$ correlation), which is calibrated using a Gaussian process from the Pantheon+ type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) sample. The authors focus on two flat cosmological models: the flat $\Lambda$CDM model and the flat $w$CDM model. To obtain constraints on these models, they consider 182 GRBs within the redshift range $0.8\le z\le8.2$ in the Hubble diagram. Additionally, they incorporate the latest observational Hubble data (OHD) through the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. For the flat $\Lambda$CDM model, Xie et al. find that $\Omega_{\rm m}$ = $0.348^{+0.048}_{-0.066}$ and $h$ = $0.680^{+0.029}_{-0.029}$.
Created on 03 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.