Predicting Perfect Quality Segments in MT Output with Fine-Tuned OpenAI LLM: Is it possible to capture editing distance patterns from historical data?
AI-generated Key Points
- Study investigates potential of fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for Translation Quality Estimation (TQE)
- TQE is crucial for assessing quality of machine translation (MT) and human translation (HT)
- Approach TQE as a binary classification task using English-Italian and English-German training data
- Fine-tuned ChatGPT achieves relatively high score in predicting translation quality, but room for improvement in accuracy
- Methodology involves collecting historical post-editing data and using OpenAI's API access to fine-tune ChatGPT model
- Contributes to understanding how LLMs can be utilized for TQE and highlights areas for further enhancement in predicting perfect quality segments in MT output
Authors: Serge Gladkoff, Gleb Erofeev, Lifeng Han, Goran Nenadic
Abstract: Translation Quality Estimation (TQE) is an important step before deploying the output translation into usage. TQE is also critical in assessing machine translation (MT) and human translation (HT) quality without seeing the reference translations. In this work, we examine if the state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) can be fine-tuned for the TQE task and their capability. We take ChatGPT as one example and approach TQE as a binary classification task. Using English-Italian and English-German training corpus, our experimental results show that fine-tuned ChatGPT via its API can achieve a relatively high score on predicting translation quality, i.e. if the translation needs to be edited, but there is definitely space to improve the accuracy. English-Italiano bilingual Abstract is available in the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.