Galactic Cosmic-ray Scattering due to Intermittent Structures

AI-generated keywords: Cosmic Rays Interstellar Medium Magnetic Fluctuations Patchy Scattering Models Rigidity

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on behavior of cosmic rays (CRs) in the interstellar medium (ISM)
  • Traditional models struggle to reproduce observables related to CR residence times and scattering rates
  • Authors propose "patchy" CR scattering models where CRs are scattered by intermittent strong structures
  • Mean free path between scattering structures must be around 10 parsecs at GeV energies
  • Constraints derived for sizes, properties, mass/volume-filling factors, and number density of scattering structures
  • Various candidate structures considered, ruling out macroscopic ones but smaller structures remain viable
  • Future observational constraints discussed to test patchy CR scattering models
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Iryna S. Butsky, Philip F. Hopkins, Philipp Kempski, Sam B. Ponnada, Eliot Quataert, Jonathan Squire

arXiv: 2308.06316v1 - DOI (astro-ph.HE)
9 pages, 3 figures, submitted to MNRAS

Abstract: Cosmic rays (CRs) with energies $\ll$ TeV comprise a significant component of the interstellar medium (ISM). Major uncertainties in CR behavior on observable scales (much larger than CR gyroradii) stem from how magnetic fluctuations scatter CRs in pitch angle. Traditional first-principles models, which assume these magnetic fluctuations are weak and uniformly scatter CRs in a homogeneous ISM, struggle to reproduce basic observables such as the dependence of CR residence times and scattering rates on rigidity. We therefore explore a new category of "patchy" CR scattering models, wherein CRs are predominantly scattered by intermittent strong scattering structures with small volume-filling factors. These models produce the observed rigidity dependence with a simple size distribution constraint, such that larger scattering structures are rarer but can scatter a wider range of CR energies. To reproduce the empirically-inferred CR scattering rates, the mean free path between scattering structures must be $\ell_{\rm mfp} \sim 10$ pc at GeV energies. We derive constraints on the sizes, internal properties, mass/volume-filling factors, and the number density any such structures would need to be both physically and observationally consistent. We consider a range of candidate structures, both large-scale (e.g. H II regions) and small-scale (e.g. intermittent turbulent structures, perhaps even associated with radio plasma scattering) and show that while many macroscopic candidates can be immediately ruled out as the primary CR scattering sites, many smaller structures remain viable and merit further theoretical study. We discuss future observational constraints that could test these models.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.06316v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study focuses on the behavior of cosmic rays (CRs) in the interstellar medium (ISM). CRs with energies much lower than a teraelectronvolt (TeV) play a significant role in the ISM. Traditional models assume weak and uniform magnetic fluctuations that scatter CRs in a homogeneous ISM. However, these models struggle to reproduce basic observables such as the dependence of CR residence times and scattering rates on rigidity. To address this issue, the authors propose a new category of "patchy" CR scattering models. In these patchy models, CRs are predominantly scattered by intermittent strong scattering structures with small volume-filling factors. These structures have a simple size distribution constraint, where larger scattering structures are rarer but can scatter a wider range of CR energies. The authors find that to reproduce empirically-inferred CR scattering rates, the mean free path between scattering structures must be around 10 parsecs at GeV energies. The study derives constraints on the sizes, internal properties, mass/volume-filling factors, and number density of these scattering structures to ensure they are both physically and observationally consistent. The authors consider various candidate structures at different scales, including large-scale structures like H II regions and small-scale structures like intermittent turbulent structures or those associated with radio plasma scattering. While many macroscopic candidates can be ruled out as primary CR scattering sites based on their analysis, several smaller structures remain viable and warrant further theoretical investigation. The paper also discusses future observational constraints that could potentially test these patchy CR scattering models. Overall, this study provides insights into the behavior of cosmic rays in the interstellar medium and proposes new models that better explain observed phenomena related to their residence times and scattering rates.
Created on 21 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.