AI summary · arXiv: 2308.10792v1 · cs.CL

Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Survey

Shengyu Zhang, Linfeng Dong, Xiaoya Li, Sen Zhang, Xiaofei Sun, Shuhe Wang, Jiwei Li, Runyi Hu,

and 3 more authorsTianwei Zhang, Fei Wu, Guoyin Wang

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 21 Aug. 2023 A Survey paper, Pre-print License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

The essentials

  • Comprehensive survey of research works in the field of instruction tuning (IT)
  • IT enhances capabilities and controllability of large language models (LLMs)
  • IT involves training LLMs on a dataset of (instruction, output) pairs
  • Bridging the gap between next-word prediction objective and users' objective
  • Systematic review covering methodology, datasets, training, and applications
  • Analysis of factors influencing IT outcome: instruction outputs and dataset size
  • Discussion on potential pitfalls and criticisms against IT
  • Emphasis on need for instinct or common sense in question creation for event duration tasks
  • Positive and negative examples provided for question creation guidance
  • Caution against explicit mentions of answers in text
  • Specific task instances for generating questions related to event duration based on given sentences

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Instruction Tuning Large Language Models Factors Criticisms Event Duration

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of research works in the field of instruction tuning (IT), which is a crucial technique for enhancing the capabilities and controllability of large language models (LLMs). IT involves further training LLMs on a dataset consisting of \textsc{(instruction, output)} pairs in a supervised fashion, bridging the gap between the next-word prediction objective of LLMs and the users' objective of having LLMs adhere to human instructions. The authors systematically review the literature on IT, covering various aspects such as the general methodology of IT, construction of IT datasets, training of IT models, and applications to different modalities, domains, and tasks. They also analyze factors that influence the outcome of IT including generation of instruction outputs and size of the instruction dataset. Additionally, this paper discusses potential pitfalls and criticisms against IT. It highlights efforts that identify current deficiencies in existing strategies and suggests avenues for future research. The authors emphasize the need for instinct or common sense in creating questions that involve "event duration" for tasks like MC-TACO question generation. They provide positive and negative examples to guide question creation and caution against explicit mentions of answers in text. Furthermore, this paper includes specific task instances for generating questions related to event duration based on given sentences. These instances demonstrate how participants are expected to formulate questions using their understanding of how long events typically last. Overall, this expanded summary provides a detailed overview of the paper's content including its focus on instruction tuning in large language models; analysis of influencing factors and pitfalls; discussion on criticism and deficiencies in existing strategies; suggestions for fruitful research directions; as well as specific instructions for generating questions involving commonsense understanding of event duration.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.