Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.10792v1

This paper provides a comprehensive survey of research works in the field of instruction tuning (IT), which is a crucial technique for enhancing the capabilities and controllability of large language models (LLMs). IT involves further training LLMs on a dataset consisting of \textsc{(instruction, output)} pairs in a supervised fashion, bridging the gap between the next-word prediction objective of LLMs and the users' objective of having LLMs adhere to human instructions. The authors systematically review the literature on IT, covering various aspects such as the general methodology of IT, construction of IT datasets, training of IT models, and applications to different modalities, domains, and tasks. They also analyze factors that influence the outcome of IT including generation of instruction outputs and size of the instruction dataset. Additionally, this paper discusses potential pitfalls and criticisms against IT. It highlights efforts that identify current deficiencies in existing strategies and suggests avenues for future research. The authors emphasize the need for instinct or common sense in creating questions that involve "event duration" for tasks like MC-TACO question generation. They provide positive and negative examples to guide question creation and caution against explicit mentions of answers in text. Furthermore, this paper includes specific task instances for generating questions related to event duration based on given sentences. These instances demonstrate how participants are expected to formulate questions using their understanding of how long events typically last. Overall, this expanded summary provides a detailed overview of the paper's content including its focus on instruction tuning in large language models; analysis of influencing factors and pitfalls; discussion on criticism and deficiencies in existing strategies; suggestions for fruitful research directions; as well as specific instructions for generating questions involving commonsense understanding of event duration.

• - Comprehensive survey of research works in the field of instruction tuning (IT)
• - IT enhances capabilities and controllability of large language models (LLMs)
• - IT involves training LLMs on a dataset of (instruction, output) pairs
• - Bridging the gap between next-word prediction objective and users' objective
• - Systematic review covering methodology, datasets, training, and applications
• - Analysis of factors influencing IT outcome: instruction outputs and dataset size
• - Discussion on potential pitfalls and criticisms against IT
• - Emphasis on need for instinct or common sense in question creation for event duration tasks
• - Positive and negative examples provided for question creation guidance
• - Caution against explicit mentions of answers in text
• - Specific task instances for generating questions related to event duration based on given sentences

This is a summary of a research study about making computer programs better. They looked at how to make big language models work even better. They trained these models using a set of instructions and outputs. The study also talked about how to make sure the models understand what users want. They reviewed different ways to train the models and talked about the good and bad things that can happen. They also gave examples of how to ask questions about events based on sentences." Definitions- Comprehensive: including everything or almost everything - Survey: a detailed examination or study - Research works: studies or experiments done by scientists - Field: an area of study or expertise - Instruction tuning (IT): improving computer programs by adjusting their instructions - Enhances: makes better or improves - Capabilities: abilities or skills - Controllability: ability to control or manage something - Large language models (LLMs): computer programs that understand and generate human language - Dataset: a collection of data used for training or analysis - Bridging the gap: connecting two things that are far apart - Next-word prediction objective: trying to guess what word comes next in a sentence - Users' objective: what users want or need from the computer program - Systematic review: carefully looking at all aspects of something in an organized way - Methodology: the methods or techniques used in a study - Factors influencing IT outcome: things that affect how well instruction tuning works - Emphasis on

Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey

Language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular due to their ability to generate natural language text. However, they are limited in terms of controllability and capability when it comes to following human instructions. Instruction tuning (IT) is a technique that bridges this gap by further training LLMs on a dataset consisting of \textsc{(instruction, output)} pairs in a supervised fashion. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of research works in the field of IT, covering various aspects such as the general methodology, construction of datasets, training models, and applications to different modalities and tasks.

General Methodology

The authors provide an overview of the general methodology behind instruction tuning. The process begins with constructing an instruction dataset which consists of \textsc{(instruction, output)} pairs. These instructions can be provided in various forms including natural language or structured data formats like SQL queries or programming languages depending on the task at hand. Once the dataset is created, it is used to train an IT model which can then be deployed for inference purposes where it takes user-provided instructions as input and produces desired outputs accordingly.

Construction Of Datasets

The authors discuss factors that influence the outcome of IT including generation of instruction outputs and size of the instruction dataset. They emphasize that generating high quality outputs requires careful design decisions such as selecting appropriate evaluation metrics and balancing between coverage and accuracy while creating datasets for specific tasks. Additionally, they suggest using existing resources such as question answering datasets or crowd-sourced annotations to reduce manual effort required for constructing large scale datasets from scratch if needed.

Training Of Models

This paper covers several strategies used for training IT models such as fine-tuning pre-trained LLMs with additional layers added on top; using reinforcement learning techniques; or even combining both approaches together depending on application requirements. It also discusses methods employed during inference time such as beam search or sampling based decoding algorithms along with their respective tradeoffs between speed vs accuracy considerations while generating outputs from given inputs efficiently without sacrificing quality too much at same time .

Applications To Different Modalities And Tasks

The authors review applications related to different modalities like text or audio/visual media along with various tasks ranging from question answering systems; automated dialogue agents; image captioning systems etc., all utilizing IT techniques discussed earlier in this paper effectively . They also analyze potential pitfalls associated with these applications including issues related to long tail distributions , lack of interpretability , difficulty in obtaining ground truth labels etc., thus providing valuable insights into current limitations faced by existing strategies .

Future Directions For Research

The authors identify certain deficiencies present within existing strategies and suggest fruitful directions for future research efforts involving instinctive understanding capabilities through common sense reasoning ; development more efficient architectures capable handling larger amounts data ; better utilization transfer learning techniques improve performance across multiple domains simultaneously ; incorporating feedback loops enable continual learning scenarios etc.. Furthermore , they provide specific examples demonstrating how participants should formulate questions involving event duration based on given sentences using their own commonsense understanding instead explicit mentions answers within text itself . Overall , this expanded summary provides detailed overview content included within paper's focus instruction tuning large language models ; analysis influencing factors pitfalls ; discussion criticism deficiencies existing strategies ; suggestions fruitful research directions ; well specific instructions generating questions involving commonsense understanding event duration .