Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.12014v1

In the paper titled "From Instructions to Intrinsic Human Values - A Survey of Alignment Goals for Big Models," authors Jing Yao, Xiaoyuan Yi, Xiting Wang, Jindong Wang, and Xing Xie discuss the challenges and potential risks associated with big models, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs). These models are pre-trained on massive amounts of data and consist of a large number of parameters. While they offer improved performance across various tasks and possess emergent capabilities not found in smaller models, their integration into everyday human lives raises concerns about potential social harm. To address these concerns, efforts have been made to align LLMs with humans in order to better follow user instructions and satisfy human preferences. However, the question of "what to align with" has not been fully explored, and inappropriate alignment goals may even have negative consequences. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive survey of different alignment goals proposed in existing work and trace their evolution paths to identify the most essential goal. The authors approach this investigation from two perspectives: the definition of alignment goals and alignment evaluation. They analyze existing works and categorize alignment goals into three distinct levels: fundamental abilities, task-specific objectives, and value orientation. Through this analysis, they observe a transformation in alignment goals from focusing on fundamental abilities to prioritizing intrinsic human values as the ultimate goal for enhanced LLMs. Based on their findings, the authors further discuss the challenges involved in achieving intrinsic value alignment between big models and humans. They also provide a collection of available resources for future research on aligning big models with human values. Overall, this paper sheds light on the importance of aligning big models with humans while highlighting the need for careful consideration when determining alignment goals. By emphasizing intrinsic human values as a crucial aspect of alignment it offers valuable insights for researchers working towards enhancing LLMs while minimizing potential social harms.

• - Big models, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), pose challenges and potential risks
• - Integration of LLMs into human lives raises concerns about social harm
• - Efforts have been made to align LLMs with humans to follow instructions and satisfy preferences
• - The question of "what to align with" has not been fully explored
• - Inappropriate alignment goals may have negative consequences
• - This paper provides a comprehensive survey of alignment goals proposed in existing work
• - Alignment goals are categorized into fundamental abilities, task-specific objectives, and value orientation
• - Alignment goals have evolved from focusing on fundamental abilities to prioritizing intrinsic human values
• - Challenges in achieving intrinsic value alignment between big models and humans are discussed
• - Available resources for future research on aligning big models with human values are provided

Big models, like Large Language Models (LLMs), can be a problem and have potential risks. People are worried about how LLMs will affect society. People are trying to make LLMs understand and do what humans want them to do. We don't know exactly what LLMs should be aligned with yet. If we align LLMs with the wrong things, it could cause problems. This paper talks about different goals for aligning LLMs with humans. These goals are grouped into basic abilities, specific tasks, and human values. The focus has shifted from abilities to values over time. It's hard to make big models and humans have the same values. There are resources available for more research on aligning big models with human values." Definitions- Big models: Large computer programs that can process a lot of information. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Specific types of big models that work with language. - Alignment: Making sure two things match or work well together. - Social harm: Negative effects on society. - Intrinsic: Something that is important or valuable in itself. - Categorized: Grouped or organized into categories. - Fundamental abilities: Basic skills or capabilities. - Task-specific objectives: Goals related to specific tasks or activities. - Value orientation: Prioritizing certain beliefs or principles. - Resources: Things that can help with research or study.

From Instructions to Intrinsic Human Values: A Survey of Alignment Goals for Big Models

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized the field of artificial intelligence, offering improved performance across various tasks and capabilities not found in smaller models. However, with their integration into everyday human lives comes a set of concerns about potential social harm. To address these issues, researchers have been working towards aligning LLMs with humans in order to better follow user instructions and satisfy human preferences. In this paper titled “From Instructions to Intrinsic Human Values - A Survey of Alignment Goals for Big Models” authors Jing Yao, Xiaoyuan Yi, Xiting Wang, Jindong Wang and Xing Xie discuss the challenges associated with determining alignment goals for big models as well as provide valuable insights on how best to achieve intrinsic value alignment between them and humans.

Defining Alignment Goals

The authors begin by analyzing existing works in order to categorize different alignment goals into three distinct levels: fundamental abilities, task-specific objectives and value orientation. They observe that while initially the focus was on developing fundamental abilities such as language understanding or commonsense reasoning, more recent works have shifted towards prioritizing intrinsic human values like fairness or privacy protection as an ultimate goal for enhanced LLMs.

Evaluating Alignment

In addition to defining different alignment goals proposed in existing work, the authors also explore ways in which they can be evaluated. They note that while some evaluation metrics are task-dependent such as accuracy or perplexity scores for language modeling tasks; others are more general such as ethical considerations when assessing fairness or privacy protection measures taken by LLMs. Furthermore they suggest that future research should focus on developing unified evaluation metrics which can assess multiple aspects simultaneously rather than relying solely on task-specific ones.

Challenges Involved

Despite its importance however achieving intrinsic value alignment between big models and humans is no easy feat due to several challenges involved including lack of interpretability making it difficult to identify potential biases; lack of data availability preventing effective training; limited resources available for research purposes; and inadequate awareness among users regarding potential risks associated with using LLMs etc.. The authors further discuss these challenges at length along with possible solutions which could be employed going forward such as increasing transparency through explainable AI techniques or providing educational materials related to responsible use of LLMs etc..

Conclusion

Overall this paper provides a comprehensive survey of different alignment goals proposed in existing work while emphasizing intrinsic human values as a crucial aspect of successful alignment between big models and humans. By highlighting the need for careful consideration when determining appropriate goals it offers valuable insights into how best we can enhance our current technology while minimizing potential social harms caused by its misuse.