An investigation into the impact of deep learning model choice on sex and race bias in cardiac MR segmentation

AI-generated keywords: Medical imaging Artificial intelligence Biases Deep learning models Fairness

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • AI is increasingly used in medical imaging to automate tasks
  • Concerns about biases in AI algorithms leading to unequal outcomes among demographic groups
  • Study by Tiarna Lee et al. focused on sex and race bias in cardiac MR segmentation
  • Imbalances in subject sex and race within training datasets can influence AI-based image segmentation
  • Three convolutional neural network-based models and one vision transformer model were evaluated
  • Significant sex bias found in three out of four models, racial bias observed across all models
  • Severity and nature of biases varied depending on the specific model used
  • Importance of selecting appropriate model for fair AI-based segmentation in medical imaging tasks
  • Addressing biases through thoughtful model choice can lead to more equitable and accurate medical imaging technologies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tiarna Lee, Esther Puyol-Antón, Bram Ruijsink, Keana Aitcheson, Miaojing Shi, Andrew P. King

Abstract: In medical imaging, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to automate routine tasks. However, these algorithms can exhibit and exacerbate biases which lead to disparate performances between protected groups. We investigate the impact of model choice on how imbalances in subject sex and race in training datasets affect AI-based cine cardiac magnetic resonance image segmentation. We evaluate three convolutional neural network-based models and one vision transformer model. We find significant sex bias in three of the four models and racial bias in all of the models. However, the severity and nature of the bias varies between the models, highlighting the importance of model choice when attempting to train fair AI-based segmentation models for medical imaging tasks.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.13415v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of medical imaging, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized to streamline and automate routine tasks. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential biases exhibited by these AI algorithms, which can result in unequal performance outcomes among different demographic groups. In a recent study conducted by Tiarna Lee, Esther Puyol-Antón, Bram Ruijsink, Keana Aitcheson, Miaojing Shi, and Andrew P. King, the impact of deep learning model selection on sex and race bias in cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) segmentation was investigated. The researchers specifically focused on how imbalances in subject sex and race within training datasets can influence AI-based cine cardiac MR image segmentation. To assess this phenomenon, three convolutional neural network-based models and one vision transformer model were evaluated. The findings revealed significant sex bias present in three out of the four models examined, while racial bias was observed across all models. Interestingly, the severity and nature of these biases varied depending on the specific model used. This study underscores the critical importance of carefully selecting an appropriate model when training fair AI-based segmentation models for medical imaging tasks. By acknowledging and addressing biases inherent in AI algorithms through thoughtful model choice, researchers can work towards developing more equitable and accurate medical imaging technologies that benefit all individuals regardless of their sex or race.
Created on 10 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.