This paper provides a summary of the work conducted in the author's PhD thesis, which focuses on investigating the impact of bias in NLP models on hate speech detection. The research explores this topic from three perspectives: explainability, offensive stereotyping bias, and fairness. The main findings suggest that bias in NLP models significantly affects hate speech detection. However, the current methods for measuring and mitigating bias in NLP models are deemed inefficient due to their failure to incorporate social sciences literature and methods. To address these limitations and promote further research in this area, several recommendations are proposed. Firstly, it is suggested to organize specialized conferences and workshops that emphasize fairness and societal impact in NLP models. Additionally, interdisciplinary workshops between NLP and social sciences should be encouraged to foster collaboration and knowledge exchange. Diversity within NLP research teams is also advocated for as well as incorporating diversity workshops into NLP conferences. The future research directions outlined include expanding the study beyond English language and Western perspectives by creating biased datasets in different languages to investigate social bias in pre-trained multilingual NLP models. Furthermore, it is important to examine bias against marginalized groups outside of Western societies. The conclusion summarizes the main contributions of the thesis and discusses its limitations. It emphasizes the need for incorporating social sciences literature and methods to effectively measure and mitigate bias in NLP models. Overall, this work provides valuable insights into understanding bias and fairness issues in NLP models with implications for improving text classification tasks related to hate speech detection.
- - The paper focuses on investigating the impact of bias in NLP models on hate speech detection
- - Three perspectives explored: explainability, offensive stereotyping bias, and fairness
- - Bias in NLP models significantly affects hate speech detection
- - Current methods for measuring and mitigating bias are deemed inefficient
- - Recommendations proposed:
- - Organize specialized conferences and workshops emphasizing fairness and societal impact in NLP models
- - Encourage interdisciplinary workshops between NLP and social sciences
- - Advocate for diversity within NLP research teams
- - Incorporate diversity workshops into NLP conferences
- - Future research directions outlined:
- - Expand study beyond English language and Western perspectives by creating biased datasets in different languages to investigate social bias in pre-trained multilingual NLP models
- - Examine bias against marginalized groups outside of Western societies
- - Conclusion emphasizes the need for incorporating social sciences literature and methods to effectively measure and mitigate bias in NLP models
This paper is about studying how bias in computer programs that understand human language can affect finding hateful speech. They looked at three different ways to think about this: how easy it is to explain the program's decisions, if it unfairly stereotypes certain groups, and if it treats everyone fairly. Bias in these programs really does make a difference in finding hate speech. The ways we currently try to measure and fix this bias aren't very good. The paper suggests some things we could do, like having special meetings and workshops about fairness in these programs, getting people who study both computers and society to work together, making sure there are different kinds of people on the teams that make these programs, and having workshops about diversity at meetings for people who work on these programs. In the future, they want to look at more languages and cultures to see if the bias is different there, and also look at groups of people who aren't treated fairly in Western societies. They say we need to use ideas from social sciences to really understand and fix this bias."
Definitions- Bias: When something or someone has a preference for or against something else.
- NLP models: Computer programs that understand human language.
- Hate speech: Words or actions that are mean or hurtful towards certain groups of people.
- Explainability: How easy it is to understand why a computer program made a certain decision.
- Offensive stereotyping bias: When a computer program unfairly makes assumptions about certain groups of people based on stereotypes.
- Fairness
Exploring the Impact of Bias in NLP Models on Hate Speech Detection
Natural language processing (NLP) models have become increasingly popular in recent years, with applications ranging from sentiment analysis to hate speech detection. However, these models are not without their flaws and can be subject to bias. This research paper provides a summary of the work conducted in the author's PhD thesis, which focuses on investigating the impact of bias in NLP models on hate speech detection.
Background
The research explores this topic from three perspectives: explainability, offensive stereotyping bias, and fairness. Explainability seeks to understand why certain decisions were made by an AI model while offensive stereotyping bias refers to how gender or racial stereotypes can influence a model’s decision-making process. Fairness is concerned with ensuring that all individuals are treated equally regardless of their race or gender.
Findings
The main findings suggest that bias in NLP models significantly affects hate speech detection. However, the current methods for measuring and mitigating bias in NLP models are deemed inefficient due to their failure to incorporate social sciences literature and methods such as qualitative interviews and surveys. To address these limitations and promote further research in this area, several recommendations are proposed.
Recommendations
Firstly, it is suggested to organize specialized conferences and workshops that emphasize fairness and societal impact in NLP models as well as interdisciplinary workshops between NLP and social sciences should be encouraged to foster collaboration and knowledge exchange. Diversity within NLP research teams is also advocated for as well as incorporating diversity workshops into existing NLP conferences such as ACL or NeurIPS.
Future Research Directions
The future research directions outlined include expanding the study beyond English language and Western perspectives by creating biased datasets in different languages to investigate social bias in pre-trained multilingual NLP models; examining biases against marginalized groups outside of Western societies; exploring ways of mitigating biases through data augmentation techniques; developing new metrics for assessing fairness; improving interpretability tools for understanding how decisions were made by an AI system; etc..
Conclusion
The conclusion summarizes the main contributions of the thesis which include providing insights into understanding bias issues related to hate speech detection tasks using natural language processing (NLP) systems with implications for improving text classification tasks related to hate speech detection while discussing its limitations such as lack of empirical evidence due limited resources available during PhD studies . It emphasizes the need for incorporating social sciences literature and methods into existing approaches used measure/mitigate biases present within machine learning algorithms so they can effectively detect hateful content online without discriminating against any particular group or individual based on race/gender/religion etc.. Overall, this work provides valuable insights into understanding bias issues related natural language processing (NLP) systems with implications for improving text classification tasks related hate speech detection while highlighting potential areas future research could focus on improve accuracy & reduce discrimination when detecting hateful content online using artificial intelligence (AI).