RAIN: Your Language Models Can Align Themselves without Finetuning

AI-generated keywords: Natural Language Processing Large Language Models Reinforcement Learning Self-Evaluation Adversarial Attack

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large language models (LLMs) have inconsistencies with human preferences in natural language processing
  • Previous research attempted to align LLMs with human preferences using reinforcement learning or instruction tuning
  • Aligning frozen LLMs without additional data is desirable
  • The study proposes a method called Rewindable Auto-regressive INference (RAIN) to align unaligned LLMs directly without extra data
  • RAIN integrates self-evaluation and rewind mechanisms for consistent responses with human preferences through self-boosting
  • RAIN operates without training, gradient computation, or parameter updates
  • During the self-evaluation phase, the model receives guidance on alignment through a fixed-template prompt
  • Experimental results show the effectiveness of RAIN evaluated by GPT-4 and humans
  • RAIN significantly improves harmlessness rate of LLaMA 30B from 82% to 97% on HH dataset while maintaining helpfulness rate
  • RAIN establishes a new defense baseline against adversarial attacks llm-attacks on Vicuna 33B by reducing attack success rate from 94% to 19%
  • This work presents a novel approach for pre-trained LLMs to align with human preferences without finetuning or additional data
  • RAIN shows promising results in improving model behavior and defending against adversarial attacks.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yuhui Li, Fangyun Wei, Jinjing Zhao, Chao Zhang, Hongyang Zhang

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often demonstrate inconsistencies with human preferences. Previous research gathered human preference data and then aligned the pre-trained models using reinforcement learning or instruction tuning, the so-called finetuning step. In contrast, aligning frozen LLMs without any extra data is more appealing. This work explores the potential of the latter setting. We discover that by integrating self-evaluation and rewind mechanisms, unaligned LLMs can directly produce responses consistent with human preferences via self-boosting. We introduce a novel inference method, Rewindable Auto-regressive INference (RAIN), that allows pre-trained LLMs to evaluate their own generation and use the evaluation results to guide backward rewind and forward generation for AI safety. Notably, RAIN operates without the need of extra data for model alignment and abstains from any training, gradient computation, or parameter updates; during the self-evaluation phase, the model receives guidance on which human preference to align with through a fixed-template prompt, eliminating the need to modify the initial prompt. Experimental results evaluated by GPT-4 and humans demonstrate the effectiveness of RAIN: on the HH dataset, RAIN improves the harmlessness rate of LLaMA 30B over vanilla inference from 82% to 97%, while maintaining the helpfulness rate. Under the leading adversarial attack llm-attacks on Vicuna 33B, RAIN establishes a new defense baseline by reducing the attack success rate from 94% to 19%.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.07124v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of natural language processing, large language models (LLMs) have shown inconsistencies with human preferences. Previous research has attempted to align these models with human preferences by gathering preference data and using reinforcement learning or instruction tuning for fine-tuning. However, aligning frozen LLMs without any additional data is more desirable. This study explores the potential of aligning unaligned LLMs directly without the need for extra data. The researchers propose a method called Rewindable Auto-regressive INference (RAIN) that integrates self-evaluation and rewind mechanisms to enable unaligned LLMs to generate responses consistent with human preferences through self-boosting. RAIN operates without requiring extra data for model alignment and avoids training, gradient computation, or parameter updates. During the self-evaluation phase, the model receives guidance on which human preference to align with through a fixed-template prompt, eliminating the need to modify the initial prompt. Experimental results evaluated by GPT-4 and humans demonstrate the effectiveness of RAIN. On the HH dataset, RAIN significantly improves the harmlessness rate of LLaMA 30B over vanilla inference from 82% to 97%, while maintaining helpfulness rate. Additionally, under an adversarial attack called llm-attacks on Vicuna 33B, RAIN establishes a new defense baseline by reducing attack success rate from 94% to 19%. Overall, this work presents a novel approach that allows pre-trained LLMs to align themselves with human preferences without finetuning or additional data. The proposed RAIN method shows promising results in improving model behavior and defending against adversarial attacks.
Created on 18 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.