Energy balance SED modelling can be effective at high redshifts regardless of UV-FIR offsets
AI-generated Key Points
- Recent studies have raised concerns about the effectiveness of energy balance spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting codes for studying high-redshift galaxies with spatially offset ultraviolet and far-infrared emission.
- Spatial decoupling can lead to miscalculations in the overall energetics by energy balance codes, potentially hindering the recovery of true properties of these galaxies.
- A team of researchers conducted a study to evaluate the performance of the SED fitting code Magphys in recovering various properties of dusty, high-redshift galaxies.
- They generated 6,706 synthetic SEDs from four zoom-in simulations using dust continuum radiative transfer from the FIRE project.
- The team aimed to recover parameters such as stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), specific SFR, dust mass, and luminosity.
- By comparing their results with fits based solely on starlight or dust emissions alone, they demonstrated the importance of considering multi-wavelength data alongside an energy balance criterion.
- Overall, they achieved acceptable fits for 83% of the synthetic SEDs.
- The success rate decreased significantly beyond a redshift of approximately 4 due to sparser sampling of priors at earlier times when star formation histories (SFHs) must be physically plausible within age constraints imposed by the Universe's age.
- Validation using ground truth information from simulations showed that when fit quality was acceptable, Magphys estimates were independent of UV-FIR offset degree and performed similarly to previous reports on local galaxies.
Authors: P. Haskell, D. J. B. Smith, R. K. Cochrane, C. C. Hayward, D. Anglés-Alcázar
Abstract: Recent works have suggested that energy balance spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting codes may be of limited use for studying high-redshift galaxies for which the observed ultraviolet and far-infrared emission are offset (spatially `decoupled'). It has been proposed that such offsets could lead energy balance codes to miscalculate the overall energetics, preventing them from recovering such galaxies' true properties. In this work, we test how well the SED fitting code Magphys can recover the stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), specific SFR, dust mass and luminosity by fitting 6,706 synthetic SEDs generated from four zoom-in simulations of dusty, high-redshift galaxies from the FIRE project via dust continuum radiative transfer. Comparing our panchromatic results (using wavelengths 0.4-500$\mu$m, and spanning $1<z<8$) with fits based on either the starlight ($\lambda_\mathrm{eff} \le 2.2\,\mu$m) or dust ($\ge 100\,\mu$m) alone, we highlight the power of considering the full range of multi-wavelength data alongside an energy balance criterion. Overall, we obtain acceptable fits for 83 per cent of the synthetic SEDs, though the success rate falls rapidly beyond $z \approx 4$, in part due to the sparser sampling of the priors at earlier times since SFHs must be physically plausible (i.e. shorter than the age of the Universe). We use the ground truth from the simulations to show that when the quality of fit is acceptable, the fidelity of Magphys estimates is independent of the degree of UV\FIR offset, with performance very similar to that previously reported for local galaxies.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.