Bias of AI-Generated Content: An Examination of News Produced by Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: AI-generated content Large Language Models Bias Discrimination Inclusive AI

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Study titled "Bias of AI-Generated Content" by Xiao Fang et al. explores impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on our lives and work through AI-Generated Content (AIGC)
Emphasizes importance of understanding limitations of LLMs to effectively harness transformation
Focuses on investigating bias in AIGC produced by seven representative LLMs, including ChatGPT and LLaMA
Analysis conducted using news articles from reputable sources like The New York Times and Reuters as prompts for LLMs
Findings reveal significant gender and racial biases in AIGC generated by examined LLMs, with discrimination against females and individuals of Black race
ChatGPT stands out for demonstrating lower bias level compared to other models, able to decline content generation when presented with biased prompts
Research highlights critical need to address bias in AI-generated content and develop strategies to mitigate discriminatory outcomes for more equitable and inclusive AI technologies

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xiao Fang, Shangkun Che, Minjia Mao, Hongzhe Zhang, Ming Zhao, Xiaohang Zhao

arXiv: 2309.09825v1 - DOI (cs.AI)

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to transform our lives and work through the content they generate, known as AI-Generated Content (AIGC). To harness this transformation, we need to understand the limitations of LLMs. Here, we investigate the bias of AIGC produced by seven representative LLMs, including ChatGPT and LLaMA. We collect news articles from The New York Times and Reuters, both known for delivering relatively unbiased news. We then apply each examined LLM to generate news content with headlines of these news articles as prompts, and evaluate the gender and racial biases of the AIGC produced by the LLM by comparing the AIGC and the original news articles. We further analyze the gender bias of each LLM under biased prompts by adding gender-biased messages to prompts constructed from these news headlines. Our study reveals that the AIGC produced by each examined LLM demonstrates substantial gender and racial biases. Moreover, the AIGC generated by each LLM exhibits notable discrimination against females and individuals of the Black race. Among the LLMs, the AIGC generated by ChatGPT demonstrates the lowest level of bias, and ChatGPT is the sole model capable of declining content generation when provided with biased prompts.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.09825v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In their study titled "Bias of AI-Generated Content: An Examination of News Produced by Large Language Models," authors Xiao Fang, Shangkun Che, Minjia Mao, Hongzhe Zhang, Ming Zhao, and Xiaohang Zhao delve into the potential transformative impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on our lives and work through the generation of AI-Generated Content (AIGC). The researchers emphasize the importance of understanding the limitations of LLMs to effectively harness this transformation. The study focuses on investigating the bias present in AIGC produced by seven representative LLMs, with a specific emphasis on models like ChatGPT and LLaMA. To conduct their analysis, the authors collect news articles from reputable sources such as The New York Times and Reuters, known for delivering relatively unbiased news content. These articles serve as prompts for the LLMs to generate news content. The findings reveal significant gender and racial biases in the AIGC generated by each examined LLM. Particularly concerning is the discrimination against females and individuals of Black race evident in the content produced by these models. Amongst the LLMs studied, ChatGPT stands out for demonstrating a lower level of bias compared to others. Notably, ChatGPT showcases an ability to decline content generation when presented with biased prompts. Overall, this research sheds light on the critical need to address bias in AI-generated content and underscores the importance of developing strategies to mitigate discriminatory outcomes in language model outputs. By understanding and addressing these biases, we can strive towards more equitable and inclusive AI technologies that better serve diverse populations.

- Study titled "Bias of AI-Generated Content" by Xiao Fang et al. explores impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on our lives and work through AI-Generated Content (AIGC)
- Emphasizes importance of understanding limitations of LLMs to effectively harness transformation
- Focuses on investigating bias in AIGC produced by seven representative LLMs, including ChatGPT and LLaMA
- Analysis conducted using news articles from reputable sources like The New York Times and Reuters as prompts for LLMs
- Findings reveal significant gender and racial biases in AIGC generated by examined LLMs, with discrimination against females and individuals of Black race
- ChatGPT stands out for demonstrating lower bias level compared to other models, able to decline content generation when presented with biased prompts
- Research highlights critical need to address bias in AI-generated content and develop strategies to mitigate discriminatory outcomes for more equitable and inclusive AI technologies

Summary1. A study by Xiao Fang and others looked at how AI-generated content affects our lives and work through Large Language Models (LLMs). 2. It's important to understand the limits of LLMs to use them well for change. 3. The study checked bias in AI-generated content made by seven main LLMs like ChatGPT and LLaMA. 4. They used news articles from trusted sources as examples for the LLMs. 5. The results showed that some LLMs have gender and racial biases, but ChatGPT was better at avoiding bias. Definitions- AI: Artificial Intelligence - technology that enables machines to learn from data and perform tasks that typically require human intelligence. - Bias: Unfair preference or dislike towards a particular group or individual, leading to discrimination. - Content: Information or material shared through various mediums such as text, images, or videos. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Advanced AI systems capable of generating human-like text based on vast amounts of data they have been trained on. - Discrimination: Unfair treatment of individuals or groups based on certain characteristics like race, gender, or age. - Equitable: Fair and impartial treatment without favoritism or discrimination. - Inclusive: Including everyone regardless of differences in background, identity, or abilities.

The Transformative Impact of Large Language Models on AI-Generated Content

In recent years, there has been a surge in the development and use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating text-based content. These models, such as GPT-3 and BERT, have shown remarkable capabilities in producing human-like language and have the potential to transform various industries, including journalism. However, with this transformation comes the risk of perpetuating biases present in our society through AI-generated content (AIGC). In their study titled "Bias of AI-Generated Content: An Examination of News Produced by Large Language Models," authors Xiao Fang, Shangkun Che, Minjia Mao, Hongzhe Zhang, Ming Zhao, and Xiaohang Zhao delve into the potential transformative impact of LLMs on our lives and work through AIGC.

Understanding the Limitations of LLMs

The researchers emphasize the importance of understanding the limitations of LLMs to effectively harness this transformation. While these models have shown impressive abilities in generating text-based content that is indistinguishable from human-written text, they are not immune to bias. This is because these models are trained on large datasets that reflect societal biases and prejudices. As a result, they may replicate or amplify these biases when generating new content. To address this issue and raise awareness about it within the AI community, Fang et al. conducted a comprehensive analysis focused on investigating bias present in AIGC produced by seven representative LLMs. The study specifically looked at models like ChatGPT and LLaMA due to their popularity among developers for generating news articles.

Examining Bias in AIGC

To conduct their analysis, Fang et al. collected news articles from reputable sources known for delivering relatively unbiased news content such as The New York Times and Reuters. These articles served as prompts for the LLMs to generate news content. The researchers then evaluated the generated content for gender and racial biases using a combination of manual and automated methods. The findings revealed significant gender and racial biases in the AIGC produced by each examined LLM. Particularly concerning is the discrimination against females and individuals of Black race evident in the content produced by these models. This bias was observed across different categories, including politics, business, sports, and entertainment. For example, one article generated by an LLM stated that "women are not fit for leadership roles" while another referred to Black individuals as "criminals."

ChatGPT: An Exceptional Model

Amongst the LLMs studied, ChatGPT stood out for demonstrating a lower level of bias compared to others. Notably, ChatGPT showcased an ability to decline content generation when presented with biased prompts. This feature sets it apart from other models that may blindly replicate biased language without any consideration. Furthermore, ChatGPT also showed potential in mitigating bias through its ability to modify or rephrase biased prompts into more neutral language before generating new content. This approach could be beneficial in reducing discriminatory outcomes in AIGC.

The Need to Address Bias in AI-Generated Content

This research highlights the critical need to address bias in AI-generated content and underscores the importance of developing strategies to mitigate discriminatory outcomes in language model outputs. With increasing reliance on AI technologies for various tasks such as decision-making processes or information dissemination, it is crucial to ensure that these systems do not perpetuate existing societal biases. Moreover, AIGC has the potential to reach a wider audience than traditional human-written articles due to its speed and scalability. Therefore, it is essential that this technology produces unbiased and inclusive content that represents diverse perspectives accurately.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Fang et al.'s study sheds light on the potential transformative impact of LLMs on AI-generated content and the need to address bias in these models. By understanding and addressing biases, we can strive towards more equitable and inclusive AI technologies that better serve diverse populations. This research serves as a crucial step towards creating a more responsible and ethical approach to developing AI systems. It also highlights the importance of ongoing research and development in this field to ensure that AI technologies benefit society as a whole without perpetuating discrimination or biases.

Created on 05 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.