Multiple Magnetoelectric Plateaux in Polar Magnet Fe$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$

AI-generated keywords: Magnetoelectric Fe$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$ Spin-saturation Exchange Striction Multistep

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on magnetization and electric polarization of Fe$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$
  • Behavior under spin-saturation magnetic fields along polar axis
  • Experiment conducted at 1.4 K
  • Magnetization process exhibits multistep structures below saturation field of 65 T
  • Electric polarization displays multistep behavior with total change of 1.2 $\rm{\mu}C/cm^{2}$
  • Proposed triangular-lattice antiferromagnetic model with strong Ising-type spin anisotropy to explain findings
  • Model successfully reproduces observed multistep magnetoelectric effect in Fe$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$
  • Exchange striction mechanism explains remarkable magnetoelectric response in two sub-lattice type-I multiferroic materials
  • Provides valuable insights into magnetoelectric effects in hybrid spin systems
  • Demonstrates effective method for realizing multistage magnetoelectric phenomena
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Qian Chen, Atsushi Miyake, Takashi Kurumaji, Keisuke Matsuura, Fumitaka Kagawa, Shin Miyahara, Yoshinori Tokura, Masashi Tokunaga

arXiv: 2309.10583v1 - DOI (cond-mat.str-el)
10 pages, 5 figures

Abstract: The magnetization and electric polarization of a polar antiferromagnet Fe$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$ are studied up to 66 T for spin-saturation magnetic fields applied along the polar axis. The magnetization process at 1.4 K exhibited multistep structures below the saturation field of 65 T. The electric polarization along the polar axis exhibits a similar multistep behavior with a total change of 1.2 $\rm{\mu}C/cm^{2}$. A combined triangular-lattice antiferromagnetic model with strong Ising-type spin anisotropy reproduces this multistep magnetoelectric (ME) effect. The exchange striction mechanism explains the remarkable ME response in the two sub-lattice type-I multiferroic materials. These results and interpretation demonstrate a method for realizing multistage magnetoelectric effects in hybrid spin systems.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.10583v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study focuses on the magnetization and electric polarization of a polar antiferromagnet Fe$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$, specifically investigating their behavior under spin-saturation magnetic fields applied along the polar axis. The experiment was conducted at a temperature of 1.4 K, and the magnetization process exhibited multistep structures below the saturation field of 65 T. Similarly, the electric polarization along the polar axis displayed a multistep behavior with a total change of 1.2 $\rm{\mu}C/cm^{2}$. To explain these findings, the researchers propose a combined triangular-lattice antiferromagnetic model with strong Ising-type spin anisotropy. This model successfully reproduces the observed multistep magnetoelectric (ME) effect in Fe$_2$Mo$_3$O$_8$. Furthermore, they suggest that this effect can be explained by the exchange striction mechanism, which accounts for the remarkable ME response in two sub-lattice type-I multiferroic materials. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into magnetoelectric effects in hybrid spin systems and demonstrates an effective method for realizing multistage magnetoelectric phenomena.
Created on 20 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.