Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.16583v1

In their paper titled "GPT-Fathom: Benchmarking Large Language Models to Decipher the Evolutionary Path towards GPT-4 and Beyond," authors Shen Zheng, Yuyu Zhang, Yijie Zhu, Chenguang Xi, Pengyang Gao, Xun Zhou, and Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang address the need for a comprehensive evaluation suite to assess the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs). They highlight that existing LLM leaderboards often lack consistent settings and prompts, leading to cherry-picking of favorable results. To address this issue, they introduce GPT-Fathom, an open-source and reproducible LLM evaluation suite built on OpenAI Evals. The authors systematically evaluate more than 10 leading LLMs, including OpenAI's legacy models, on over 20 curated benchmarks across seven capability categories. Importantly, all evaluations are conducted under aligned settings to ensure fair comparisons. Additionally, they provide a retrospective study on OpenAI's earlier models, offering valuable insights into the evolutionary path from GPT-3 to GPT-4. The community is particularly interested in understanding how GPT-3 progressively improves to GPT-4 as well as which aspects of LLM capability can be improved by techniques like SFT (Systematic Fine-Tuning) and RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback). Furthermore, they explore the impact of alignment tax. By addressing these questions through their analysis and evaluations using GPT-Fathom, the authors contribute to improving transparency in advanced LLMs. Their work provides valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of different models while establishing a standardized framework for evaluating future advancements in large language models.

• - Authors address the need for a comprehensive evaluation suite for large language models (LLMs)
• - Existing LLM leaderboards lack consistent settings and prompts, leading to cherry-picking of results
• - Introduce GPT-Fathom, an open-source and reproducible LLM evaluation suite built on OpenAI Evals
• - Systematically evaluate over 10 leading LLMs on more than 20 curated benchmarks across seven capability categories
• - All evaluations conducted under aligned settings to ensure fair comparisons
• - Provide retrospective study on OpenAI's earlier models, offering insights into the evolutionary path from GPT-3 to GPT-4
• - Community interested in understanding how GPT-3 improves to GPT-4 and which aspects can be improved by techniques like SFT and RLHF
• - Explore impact of alignment tax
• - Analysis and evaluations using GPT-Fathom contribute to improving transparency in advanced LLMs
• - Work provides valuable insights into capabilities and limitations of different models
• - Establish standardized framework for evaluating future advancements in large language models

The authors want to create a tool to test big language models. The current tools are not consistent, so they only show the best results. They made a new tool called GPT-Fathom that anyone can use. They tested many different models on different tasks to see how well they work. They made sure all the tests were fair and equal. They also looked at older models to see how they changed over time. People are interested in knowing how the models improve and what can make them better. They also studied how being fair affects the results. This work helps us understand what these models can do and what their limits are. It also sets a standard for testing future models." Definitions- Comprehensive: including everything or almost everything - Evaluation: testing or judging something - Suite: a set of tools or programs that work together - Reproducible: able to be done again in the same way - Curated: carefully selected and organized

GPT-Fathom: Benchmarking Large Language Models to Decipher the Evolutionary Path towards GPT-4 and Beyond

In their paper titled "GPT-Fathom: Benchmarking Large Language Models to Decipher the Evolutionary Path towards GPT-4 and Beyond," authors Shen Zheng, Yuyu Zhang, Yijie Zhu, Chenguang Xi, Pengyang Gao, Xun Zhou, and Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang address the need for a comprehensive evaluation suite to assess the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs). With existing LLM leaderboards often lacking consistent settings and prompts leading to cherry-picking of favorable results, they introduce GPT-Fathom as an open source and reproducible LLM evaluation suite built on OpenAI Evals.

Systematic Evaluation of More Than 10 Leading LLMs

The authors systematically evaluate more than 10 leading LLMs including OpenAI's legacy models on over 20 curated benchmarks across seven capability categories. All evaluations are conducted under aligned settings in order to ensure fair comparisons. Additionally, they provide a retrospective study on OpenAI's earlier models offering valuable insights into the evolutionary path from GPT-3 to GPT-4.

Exploring Questions Around Capability Improvement

The community is particularly interested in understanding how GPT-3 progressively improves to GPT-4 as well as which aspects of LLM capability can be improved by techniques like SFT (Systematic Fine Tuning) and RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback). Furthermore, they explore the impact of alignment tax. By addressing these questions through their analysis and evaluations using GPT Fathom, the authors contribute to improving transparency in advanced LLMs.

Providing Valuable Insights Into Capabilities & Limitations Of Different Models

Their work provides valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of different models while establishing a standardized framework for evaluating future advancements in large language models. Through this research paper it is clear that there is still much progress needed before we can confidently say that large language models have reached peak performance levels but with continued research such as this one we will eventually get there!