Reason for Future, Act for Now: A Principled Framework for Autonomous LLM Agents with Provable Sample Efficiency
AI-generated Key Points
- Large language models (LLMs) have impressive reasoning abilities
- Translating reasoning into actions in the real world is challenging
- The main issue is completing tasks with minimal interactions using internal reasoning
- Proposed framework called "Reason for Future, Act for Now" (RAFA)
- RAFA orchestrates reasoning and acting with provable regret guarantees
- Prompt template for reasoning that learns from a memory buffer and plans future trajectory
- LLM agent takes initial action of planned trajectory, stores feedback, and replans
- Reasoning in LLMs as learning and planning in Bayesian adaptive Markov decision processes (MDPs)
- Learning and planning performed in an "in-context" manner for actor-critic updates
- Theoretical analysis shows regret proportional to √T (number of interactions)
- Empirical validation shows RAFA outperforms existing frameworks on interactive decision-making tasks
- Focus on tasks where LLM agents optimize actions iteratively by collecting feedback
- Three interleaved modules: learning, planning, and acting in a closed loop
- Core contribution is a principled framework that executes selected subset of planned trajectory to collect feedbacks and replans from new state by learning from feedbacks
- Rigorous mapping between LLMs and reinforcement learning (RL) through RAFA
Authors: Zhihan Liu, Hao Hu, Shenao Zhang, Hongyi Guo, Shuqi Ke, Boyi Liu, Zhaoran Wang
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive reasoning abilities, but translating reasoning into actions in the real world remains challenging. In particular, it remains unclear how to complete a given task provably within a minimum number of interactions with the external environment, e.g., through an internal mechanism of reasoning. To this end, we propose a principled framework with provable regret guarantees to orchestrate reasoning and acting, which we call "reason for future, act for now" (\texttt{RAFA}). Specifically, we design a prompt template for reasoning that learns from the memory buffer and plans a future trajectory over a long horizon ("reason for future"). At each step, the LLM agent takes the initial action of the planned trajectory ("act for now"), stores the collected feedback in the memory buffer, and reinvokes the reasoning routine to replan the future trajectory from the new state. The key idea is to cast reasoning in LLMs as learning and planning in Bayesian adaptive Markov decision processes (MDPs). Correspondingly, we prompt LLMs to form an updated posterior of the unknown environment from the memory buffer (learning) and generate an optimal trajectory for multiple future steps that maximizes a value function (planning). The learning and planning subroutines are performed in an "in-context" manner to emulate the actor-critic update for MDPs. Our theoretical analysis proves that the novel combination of long-term reasoning and short-term acting achieves a $\sqrt{T}$ regret. In particular, the regret bound highlights an intriguing interplay between the prior knowledge obtained through pretraining and the uncertainty reduction achieved by reasoning and acting. Our empirical validation shows that it outperforms various existing frameworks and achieves nearly perfect scores on a few benchmarks.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.