AI summary · arXiv: 2310.01352v3 · cs.CL

RA-DIT: Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuning

Xi Victoria Lin, Xilun Chen, Mingda Chen, Weijia Shi, Maria Lomeli, Rich James, Pedro Rodriguez, Jacob Kahn,

and 4 more authorsGergely Szilvasy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, Scott Yih

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 02 Oct. 2023 v3: Add the performance of full RA-DIT model on commonsense reasoning tasks 24 pages License: not stated (all rights reserved)

The essentials

  • Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) improve performance by accessing long-tail and up-to-date knowledge from external data stores.
  • Existing approaches for building RALMs either require expensive modifications to LM pre-training or use post-hoc integration of the data store, leading to suboptimal performance.
  • The authors introduce Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuning (RA-DIT), a lightweight fine-tuning methodology that retrofit any LLM with retrieval capabilities.
  • RA-DIT operates in two distinct fine-tuning steps: updating the pre-trained LM to better utilize retrieved information and updating the retriever to return more relevant results preferred by the LM.
  • Fine-tuning over tasks that require both knowledge utilization and contextual awareness leads to significant performance improvements at each stage, with additional gains when using both stages.
  • The best model proposed in this study, RA-DIT 65B, achieves state-of-the-art performance across various knowledge intensive zero and few shot learning benchmarks.
  • RA-DIT 65B outperforms existing in context RALM approaches by up to +8.9% in the 0 shot setting and +1.4% in the 5 shot setting on average.
  • The paper provides additional details on their approach and experimental results for commonsense reasoning tasks.
  • The authors also discuss related work in this area.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Retrieval-Augmented Language Models (RALMs)

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) have shown promise in improving performance by accessing long-tail and up-to-date knowledge from external data stores. However, building RALMs is challenging, as existing approaches either require expensive modifications to LM pre-training or use post-hoc integration of the data store, leading to suboptimal performance. In this paper, the authors introduce Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuning (RA-DIT), a lightweight fine-tuning methodology that offers a third option by retrofitting any LLM with retrieval capabilities. RA-DIT operates in two distinct fine-tuning steps: the first step updates a pre-trained LM to better utilize retrieved information, while the second step updates the retriever to return more relevant results preferred by the LM. By fine-tuning over tasks that require both knowledge utilization and contextual awareness, the authors demonstrate significant performance improvements at each stage. Furthermore, using both stages leads to additional gains. The best model proposed in this study, RA-DIT 65B, achieves state-of-the-art performance across various knowledge intensive zero and few shot learning benchmarks. It outperforms existing in context RALM approaches by up to +8.9% in the 0 shot setting and +1.4% in the 5 shot setting on average. The paper provides additional details on their approach and experimental results for commonsense reasoning tasks. The authors also discuss related work in this area.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.