Towards End-to-End Embodied Decision Making via Multi-modal Large Language Model: Explorations with GPT4-Vision and Beyond

AI-generated keywords: Multimodal Large Language Models

AI-generated Key Points

  • Researchers explore the potential of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in improving embodied decision-making processes for agents.
  • Introduction of a new benchmark called PCA-EVAL, which evaluates embodied decision-making from the perspectives of Perception, Cognition, and Action.
  • Annotation process consists of Dataset Annotation and Dataset Refinement stages.
  • Evaluation process for assessing state-of-the-art Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs) on end-to-end embodied decision-making using PCA-EVAL is detailed.
  • Proposal of HOLMES, a multi-agent cooperation framework that allows collaboration between LLMs and MLLMs to enhance decision-making.
  • Comparison between end-to-end embodied decision-making with HOLMES shows GPT4-Vision model outperforming GPT4-HOLMES in terms of average decision accuracy (+3%).
  • GPT4-Vision surpasses open-source state-of-the-art MLLM by 26% in terms of performance.
  • Powerful MLLMs like GPT4-Vision hold promise for decision-making in embodied agents.
  • Overall, the study highlights the potential of MLLMs in improving embodied decision-making processes and introduces a new benchmark for evaluation.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Liang Chen, Yichi Zhang, Shuhuai Ren, Haozhe Zhao, Zefan Cai, Yuchi Wang, Tianyu Liu, Baobao Chang

18 pages, 10 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: In this study, we explore the potential of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in improving embodied decision-making processes for agents. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely used due to their advanced reasoning skills and vast world knowledge, MLLMs like GPT4-Vision offer enhanced visual understanding and reasoning capabilities. We investigate whether state-of-the-art MLLMs can handle embodied decision-making in an end-to-end manner and whether collaborations between LLMs and MLLMs can enhance decision-making. To address these questions, we introduce a new benchmark called PCA-EVAL, which evaluates embodied decision-making from the perspectives of Perception, Cognition, and Action. Additionally, we propose HOLMES, a multi-agent cooperation framework that allows LLMs to leverage MLLMs and APIs to gather multimodal information for informed decision-making. We compare end-to-end embodied decision-making and HOLMES on our benchmark and find that the GPT4-Vision model demonstrates strong end-to-end embodied decision-making abilities, outperforming GPT4-HOLMES in terms of average decision accuracy (+3%). However, this performance is exclusive to the latest GPT4-Vision model, surpassing the open-source state-of-the-art MLLM by 26%. Our results indicate that powerful MLLMs like GPT4-Vision hold promise for decision-making in embodied agents, offering new avenues for MLLM research.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.02071v1

, , , , In this study, the researchers explore the potential of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in improving embodied decision-making processes for agents. They introduce a new benchmark called PCA-EVAL, which evaluates embodied decision-making from the perspectives of Perception, Cognition, and Action. The annotation process consists of two stages: Dataset Annotation and Dataset Refinement. During the initial stage, annotators pinpoint informative source images and write questions for each image. In the subsequent stage, annotators scrutinize the output actions and rationales presented by ChatGPT to refine annotations and ensure a single correct answer. The evaluation process for assessing state-of-the-art Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs) on end-to-end embodied decision-making using PCA-EVAL is detailed. End-to-end decision making involves directly feeding visual observations and textual questions to the multi-modal agent. The agent outputs image descriptions and reasoning processes before giving the final action. Additionally, the researchers propose HOLMES, a multi-agent cooperation framework that allows large language models like ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT4 to call different visual models or APIs to gather information about the environment. HOLMES enables collaboration between LLMs and MLLMs to enhance decision-making. The researchers compare end-to-end embodied decision-making with HOLMES on their benchmark and find that the GPT4-Vision model demonstrates strong end-to-end embodied decision-making abilities, outperforming GPT4-HOLMES in terms of average decision accuracy (+3%). However, this performance is exclusive to GPT4-Vision, surpassing the open-source state-of-the-art MLLM by 26%. These results suggest that powerful MLLMs like GPT4-Vision hold promise for decision-making in embodied agents. Overall, this study highlights the potential of MLLMs in improving embodied decision-making processes for agents and introduces a new benchmark for evaluating such capabilities. The proposed HOLMES framework allows for collaboration between LLMs and MLLMs, further enhancing decision-making abilities. The findings contribute to the advancement of MLLM research and offer new avenues for improving decision-making in embodied agents.
Created on 01 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.