Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.02207v1

The capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have been a topic of debate, with some questioning whether these models simply learn superficial statistics or if they develop a coherent understanding of the underlying data generating process. In this study, we aim to provide evidence for the latter by analyzing the learned representations of Llama-2 family models across various spatial and temporal datasets. For our spatial analysis, we examine three datasets: world places, US places, and NYC places. We find that LLMs learn linear representations of space at multiple scales, which remain consistent even with variations in prompts. These representations are also unified across different types of entities such as cities and landmarks. Additionally, we identify specific "space neurons" that consistently encode spatial coordinates. In our temporal analysis, we investigate three datasets: historical figures, artworks, and news headlines. By probing the LLMs' activations on these datasets, we discover that they also learn linear representations of time. Similar to the spatial analysis, these representations are robust to prompting variations and demonstrate consistency across different types of entities. Our findings suggest that modern LLMs acquire structured knowledge about fundamental dimensions like space and time. This supports the notion that these models go beyond learning superficial statistics and instead develop literal world models. Furthermore, our study highlights the presence of individual "time neurons" and "space neurons" within LLMs that reliably encode temporal and spatial coordinates. To conduct our analysis, we utilize the base Llama-2 series of auto-regressive transformer language models with varying parameter sizes. We preprocess each dataset by running entity names through the model and saving the activations of the hidden state on the last entity token for each layer. We employ linear ridge regression probes to predict target labels associated with either time or two-dimensional latitude and longitude coordinates based on the network activations. High predictive performance indicates that LLMs possess temporal and spatial information in their representations. Our work builds upon prior research on factual recall in LLMs and draws from the interpretability literature. We contribute to the understanding of continuous facts and highlight the linear structure present in LLMs' representations. In conclusion, our analysis provides evidence that modern LLMs develop structured knowledge about space and time. These models go beyond superficial statistics and acquire literal world models.

• - Large language models (LLMs) have capabilities that have been debated
• - LLMs may develop a coherent understanding of the underlying data generating process
• - The study analyzes the learned representations of Llama-2 family models across various spatial and temporal datasets
• - Spatial analysis includes examining world places, US places, and NYC places datasets
• - LLMs learn linear representations of space at multiple scales, consistent with variations in prompts
• - Representations are unified across different types of entities such as cities and landmarks
• - "Space neurons" consistently encode spatial coordinates
• - Temporal analysis includes historical figures, artworks, and news headlines datasets
• - LLMs also learn linear representations of time, consistent with prompting variations and entity types
• - Findings suggest that modern LLMs acquire structured knowledge about space and time beyond superficial statistics
• - Individual "time neurons" and "space neurons" reliably encode temporal and spatial coordinates within LLMs
• - Base Llama-2 series of auto-regressive transformer language models with varying parameter sizes are used for analysis
• - Linear ridge regression probes are employed to predict target labels associated with time or latitude/longitude coordinates based on network activations
• - High predictive performance indicates presence of temporal and spatial information in LLM representations
• - Work builds upon prior research on factual recall in LLMs and interpretability literature
• - Concludes that modern LLMs develop structured knowledge about space and time beyond superficial statistics

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful computer programs that can understand and generate human language. They have special abilities that people have debated about. LLMs can learn and understand how data is created or generated, which means they can make sense of information. A study looked at a group of LLMs called Llama-2 family models and analyzed how they learned about different places and times from various datasets. Spatial analysis means studying different locations like cities and landmarks, while temporal analysis means studying different time periods like historical figures or news headlines. LLMs can learn about space and time in a way that matches the questions or prompts they are given. This helps them create organized representations of knowledge beyond just basic facts. In the study, researchers found that certain neurons in the LLMs consistently encode spatial coordinates (like latitude and longitude) or temporal coordinates (like dates). This shows that LLMs have structured knowledge about space and time. The researchers used a specific type of LLM called Base Llama-2 series for their analysis. They used a method called linear ridge regression to predict labels associated with time or location based on the LLM's activity. The high accuracy of these predictions suggests that the LLMs do contain information about space and time in their representations. This work builds on previous research about how well LLMs remember facts and how understandable they are. The conclusion is that modern LLMs go beyond just knowing basic statistics and actually develop organized knowledge about space and time."

Modern Language Models Acquire Structured Knowledge of Space and Time

Language models (LLMs) are powerful tools for natural language processing. While their capabilities have been debated, some suggest that these models learn superficial statistics rather than a coherent understanding of the underlying data generating process. In this study, researchers aim to provide evidence for the latter by analyzing the learned representations of LLM-2 family models across various spatial and temporal datasets.

Spatial Analysis

The researchers conducted a spatial analysis on three datasets: world places, US places, and NYC places. They found that LLMs learn linear representations of space at multiple scales which remain consistent even with variations in prompts. These representations were also unified across different types of entities such as cities and landmarks. Additionally, they identified specific "space neurons" that consistently encode spatial coordinates.

Temporal Analysis

The researchers then conducted a temporal analysis on three datasets: historical figures, artworks, and news headlines. By probing the LLMs' activations on these datasets, they discovered that they also learn linear representations of time which were robust to prompting variations and demonstrated consistency across different types of entities.

Conclusion

Overall, this research provides evidence that modern LLMs develop structured knowledge about space and time; suggesting that these models go beyond learning superficial statistics and instead acquire literal world models. Furthermore, it highlights the presence of individual "time neurons" and "space neurons" within LLMs which reliably encode temporal and spatial coordinates respectively. This work builds upon prior research on factual recall in LLMs while drawing from interpretability literature; ultimately contributing to our understanding of continuous facts by highlighting the linear structure present in LLM's representations.