LLMs Killed the Script Kiddie: How Agents Supported by Large Language Models Change the Landscape of Network Threat Testing

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Threat Analysis Automation Cyber Campaigns Ethical Considerations

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to enhance threat analysis, tool generation, and automation of cyber campaigns.
  • The study explores how LLMs can support specific actions and decisions related to threats through manual exploration.
  • Authors present prompt engineering strategies for a plan-act-report loop for individual threat actions and a prompt chaining design for sequential decision-making in multi-action campaigns.
  • The research evaluates LLM's knowledge depth in cybersecurity through a demonstrated short campaign and insights into designing prompts for actionable responses.
  • Ethical considerations are raised regarding the use of LLMs in accelerating threat actor capabilities, along with concerns about handling complex networks, sophisticated vulnerabilities, and prompt sensitivity.
  • This study is expected to stimulate discussions on the evolving role of LLM-supported technologies in shaping the cyber adversarial landscape.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Stephen Moskal, Sam Laney, Erik Hemberg, Una-May O'Reilly

Abstract: In this paper, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason about threats, generate information about tools, and automate cyber campaigns. We begin with a manual exploration of LLMs in supporting specific threat-related actions and decisions. We proceed by automating the decision process in a cyber campaign. We present prompt engineering approaches for a plan-act-report loop for one action of a threat campaign and and a prompt chaining design that directs the sequential decision process of a multi-action campaign. We assess the extent of LLM's cyber-specific knowledge w.r.t the short campaign we demonstrate and provide insights into prompt design for eliciting actionable responses. We discuss the potential impact of LLMs on the threat landscape and the ethical considerations of using LLMs for accelerating threat actor capabilities. We report a promising, yet concerning, application of generative AI to cyber threats. However, the LLM's capabilities to deal with more complex networks, sophisticated vulnerabilities, and the sensitivity of prompts are open questions. This research should spur deliberations over the inevitable advancements in LLM-supported cyber adversarial landscape.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.06936v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "LLMs Killed the Script Kiddie: How Agents Supported by Large Language Models Change the Landscape of Network Threat Testing," authors Stephen Moskal, Sam Laney, Erik Hemberg, and Una-May O'Reilly delve into the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in enhancing threat analysis, tool generation, and automation of cyber campaigns. The study begins with a manual exploration of how LLMs can support specific actions and decisions related to threats. Subsequently, the authors automate the decision-making process within a cyber campaign by presenting prompt engineering strategies for a plan-act-report loop for individual threat actions and a prompt chaining design that guides sequential decision-making in multi-action campaigns. The research evaluates the depth of LLM's knowledge in cybersecurity through a demonstrated short campaign and offers insights into designing prompts that elicit actionable responses. Additionally, the authors discuss the potential implications of LLMs on the threat landscape and raise ethical considerations regarding their use in accelerating threat actor capabilities. While acknowledging the promising application of generative AI in addressing cyber threats, they also highlight concerns about LLMs' ability to handle complex networks, sophisticated vulnerabilities, and prompt sensitivity. This study is expected to stimulate discussions on the evolving role of LLM-supported technologies in shaping the cyber adversarial landscape. By shedding light on both opportunities and challenges associated with leveraging LLMs for cybersecurity purposes, this research underscores the need for ongoing deliberations on advancing capabilities in this domain.
Created on 21 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.