Attack Prompt Generation for Red Teaming and Defending Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Red Teaming Attacks Large Language Models Attack Prompt Generation Defense Framework SAP Datasets

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Authors address vulnerability of large language models (LLMs) to red teaming attacks
Proposed integrated approach combines manual and automatic methods for generating high-quality attack prompts
Introduction of attack framework guiding LLMs to emulate human-generated prompts through in-context learning
Defense framework proposed to fine-tune victim LLMs iteratively to enhance resilience against attacks
Extensive experiments validate effectiveness of attack and defense frameworks on various LLMs
Release of attack prompt datasets named SAP in different sizes for evaluation and improvement of safety measures
Code and dataset available on GitHub for further exploration and implementation

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Boyi Deng, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Yang Deng, Qifan Wang, Xiangnan He

arXiv: 2310.12505v1 - DOI (cs.CL)

Accepted to EMNLP 2023 (Findings)

License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to red teaming attacks, which can induce LLMs to generate harmful content. Previous research constructs attack prompts via manual or automatic methods, which have their own limitations on construction cost and quality. To address these issues, we propose an integrated approach that combines manual and automatic methods to economically generate high-quality attack prompts. Specifically, considering the impressive capabilities of newly emerged LLMs, we propose an attack framework to instruct LLMs to mimic human-generated prompts through in-context learning. Furthermore, we propose a defense framework that fine-tunes victim LLMs through iterative interactions with the attack framework to enhance their safety against red teaming attacks. Extensive experiments on different LLMs validate the effectiveness of our proposed attack and defense frameworks. Additionally, we release a series of attack prompts datasets named SAP with varying sizes, facilitating the safety evaluation and enhancement of more LLMs. Our code and dataset is available on https://github.com/Aatrox103/SAP .

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.12505v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In their paper titled "Attack Prompt Generation for Red Teaming and Defending Large Language Models," authors Boyi Deng, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Yang Deng, Qifan Wang, and Xiangnan He address the vulnerability of large language models (LLMs) to red teaming attacks that can lead them to produce harmful content. The authors propose an integrated approach that combines manual and automatic methods to efficiently generate high-quality attack prompts in order to overcome limitations in cost and quality. Leveraging the advanced capabilities of newly emerged LLMs, they introduce an attack framework that guides LLMs to emulate human-generated prompts through in-context learning. Additionally, a defense framework is proposed to fine-tune victim LLMs by iteratively interacting with the attack framework to enhance their resilience against red teaming attacks. Extensive experiments conducted on various LLMs validate the effectiveness of the proposed attack and defense frameworks. Furthermore, the authors release a series of attack prompt datasets named SAP in different sizes to facilitate evaluation and improvement of safety measures for a broader range of LLMs. The code and dataset are available on GitHub for further exploration and implementation. This research was accepted at EMNLP 2023 (Findings) and significantly contributes to enhancing the security of large language models against potential adversarial attacks.

- Authors address vulnerability of large language models (LLMs) to red teaming attacks
- Proposed integrated approach combines manual and automatic methods for generating high-quality attack prompts
- Introduction of attack framework guiding LLMs to emulate human-generated prompts through in-context learning
- Defense framework proposed to fine-tune victim LLMs iteratively to enhance resilience against attacks
- Extensive experiments validate effectiveness of attack and defense frameworks on various LLMs
- Release of attack prompt datasets named SAP in different sizes for evaluation and improvement of safety measures
- Code and dataset available on GitHub for further exploration and implementation

Summary- Authors talk about how big language models can be easily tricked by bad guys. - They suggest a way to mix manual and automatic methods to make better attack ideas. - A new plan is introduced to help language models copy human-like prompts by learning from examples. - Another plan is suggested to make targeted language models stronger against attacks by adjusting them over time. - Many tests show that the attack and defense plans work well on different language models. Definitions- Authors: People who write books, articles, or research papers. - Vulnerability: Being easily harmed or tricked. - Language Models (LLMs): Computer programs that understand and generate human-like text. - Red Teaming Attacks: Tests done by experts pretending to be bad guys to find weaknesses in systems. - Framework: A structure or plan for doing something. - Resilience: The ability to bounce back from challenges or attacks. - Experiments: Tests or trials done to learn something new.

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular due to their ability to generate human-like text. However, with great power comes great responsibility. LLMs are vulnerable to red teaming attacks, where malicious actors can manipulate them into producing harmful content. In their paper titled "Attack Prompt Generation for Red Teaming and Defending Large Language Models," authors Boyi Deng, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Yang Deng, Qifan Wang, and Xiangnan He address this issue by proposing an integrated approach that combines manual and automatic methods to efficiently generate high-quality attack prompts. The first section of the paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of LLMs and their potential vulnerabilities. The authors highlight how these models have advanced in recent years and discuss the various applications they are being used for. They also delve into the potential risks associated with LLMs such as generating biased or offensive content. Next, the authors introduce their proposed attack framework that guides LLMs to emulate human-generated prompts through in-context learning. This framework leverages the advanced capabilities of newly emerged LLMs and aims to overcome limitations in cost and quality compared to traditional manual methods. The key idea behind this approach is that by training an LLM on a specific set of prompts provided by humans, it can learn patterns and mimic human-like responses when presented with similar prompts. To evaluate the effectiveness of their proposed attack framework, extensive experiments were conducted on various LLMs including GPT-2 (small), GPT-2 (medium), GPT-3 (175B), T5-base model from Hugging Face's Transformers library. The results showed that the generated attack prompts were able to successfully manipulate these models into producing harmful content such as hate speech or fake news articles. However, it's not enough just to identify vulnerabilities; we must also find ways to defend against them. Therefore, the authors also propose a defense framework that aims to fine-tune victim LLMs by iteratively interacting with the attack framework. This process helps enhance the resilience of these models against red teaming attacks. The defense framework works by continuously feeding generated attack prompts into the victim model and monitoring its responses. If the model produces harmful content, it is penalized and re-trained until it learns to identify and reject such prompts. To facilitate evaluation and improvement of safety measures for a broader range of LLMs, the authors release a series of attack prompt datasets named SAP in different sizes. These datasets are designed to test various aspects of an LLM's vulnerability, including bias, toxicity, and factuality. They are available on GitHub for further exploration and implementation. The final section of the paper discusses future directions for this research, including exploring more advanced techniques for generating attack prompts and developing more robust defense mechanisms. The authors also highlight potential real-world applications for their work such as improving content moderation systems or enhancing security measures in natural language processing (NLP) tasks. In conclusion, "Attack Prompt Generation for Red Teaming and Defending Large Language Models" presents a comprehensive study on addressing vulnerabilities in large language models through an integrated approach combining manual and automatic methods. The proposed attack framework successfully manipulates LLMs into producing harmful content while the defense framework enhances their resilience against such attacks. With extensive experiments conducted on various LLMs and the release of attack prompt datasets, this research significantly contributes to enhancing the security of large language models against potential adversarial attacks.

Created on 21 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.