AI summary · arXiv: 2310.16154v1 · cs.LG

Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality in Deep Neural Networks by Learning Invariant Representations

Leonardo Petrini
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 24 Oct. 2023 PhD Thesis @ EPFL License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Thesis explores theoretical foundations of deep learning
  • Focus on relationship between architecture of deep learning models and data structures
  • Aims to address efficacy of deep learning algorithms and overcoming curse of dimensionality
  • Deep learning learns relevant representations of data by exploiting structure
  • Empirical approach combining experimental studies with physics-inspired toy models
  • Simplified models help understand complex behaviors in deep learning systems
  • Goal is to bridge gap between theory and practice in deep learning

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Deep Learning Theory Practice Model Architecture Curse of Dimensionality

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This thesis by Leonardo Petrini explores the theoretical foundations of deep learning, with a focus on understanding the relationship between the architecture of deep learning models and the inherent structures within the data they process. The author aims to address questions such as what drives the efficacy of deep learning algorithms and allows them to overcome the curse of dimensionality, which refers to the difficulty of learning functions in high dimensions due to the exponentially increasing need for data points. The author proposes that one reason for the success of deep learning is its ability to learn relevant representations of data by exploiting their structure. To investigate these questions, Petrini takes an empirical approach to deep learning, combining experimental studies with physics-inspired toy models. These simplified models allow for a better understanding and interpretation of complex behaviors observed in deep learning systems. By studying these behaviors, Petrini aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice in deep learning. The advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly in machine learning subfields like natural language processing and computer vision, have largely been attributed to deep learning models. Deep learning surpasses traditional approaches by effectively extracting relevant features from raw data through multiple computational layers. Petrini's research focuses on understanding why deep learning algorithms are so effective and how they overcome challenges posed by high-dimensional data. The author suggests that one key factor is their ability to learn relevant representations of data by leveraging its underlying structure. Different architectures may exploit different aspects of data structures. To explore these ideas, Petrini uses an empirical approach that combines experimental studies with physics-inspired toy models. These simplified models help shed light on complex behaviors observed in deep learning systems and provide insights into their inner workings. The ultimate goal is to bridge the gap between theory and practice in order to enhance our understanding and application of deep learning techniques. In summary, this thesis delves into the theoretical foundations of deep learning by examining how model architecture relates to inherent structures within processed data. It seeks answers regarding what makes deep learning algorithms effective and how they overcome the curse of dimensionality. The research methodology combines empirical studies with physics-inspired toy models to gain insights into the inner workings of deep learning systems, with the aim of bridging the gap between theory and practice in this field.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Close
    The Modern Mathematics of Deep Learning
    Julius Berner, Philipp Grohs, Gitta Kutyniok et al. · 2021 · Mathematical Aspects of Deep Learning, pp. 1-111. Cambridge University Press, 2022 · AI summary available
    Abstract

    We describe the new field of mathematical analysis of deep learning. This field emerged around a list of research questions that were not answered within the classical framework of learning theory. These questions concern: the outstanding generalization power of overparametrized neural networks, the role of depth in deep architectures, the apparent absence of the curse of dimensionality, the surprisingly successful optimization performance despite the non-convexity of the problem, understanding what features are learned, why deep architectures perform exceptionally well in physical problems, and which fine aspects of an architecture affect the behavior of a learning task in which way. We pre…

  2. Close
    Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gauges
    Michael M. Bronstein, Joan Bruna, Taco Cohen et al. · 2021 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The last decade has witnessed an experimental revolution in data science and machine learning, epitomised by deep learning methods. Indeed, many high-dimensional learning tasks previously thought to be beyond reach -- such as computer vision, playing Go, or protein folding -- are in fact feasible with appropriate computational scale. Remarkably, the essence of deep learning is built from two simple algorithmic principles: first, the notion of representation or feature learning, whereby adapted, often hierarchical, features capture the appropriate notion of regularity for each task, and second, learning by local gradient-descent type methods, typically implemented as backpropagation. While le…

  3. Close
    The Principles of Deep Learning Theory
    Daniel A. Roberts, Sho Yaida, Boris Hanin · 2021 · Machine Learning · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    This book develops an effective theory approach to understanding deep neural networks of practical relevance. Beginning from a first-principles component-level picture of networks, we explain how to determine an accurate description of the output of trained networks by solving layer-to-layer iteration equations and nonlinear learning dynamics. A main result is that the predictions of networks are described by nearly-Gaussian distributions, with the depth-to-width aspect ratio of the network controlling the deviations from the infinite-width Gaussian description. We explain how these effectively-deep networks learn nontrivial representations from training and more broadly analyze the mechanis…

  4. Close
    Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depth
    Thao Nguyen, Maithra Raghu, Simon Kornblith · 2020 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    A key factor in the success of deep neural networks is the ability to scale models to improve performance by varying the architecture depth and width. This simple property of neural network design has resulted in highly effective architectures for a variety of tasks. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding of effects of depth and width on the learned representations. In this paper, we study this fundamental question. We begin by investigating how varying depth and width affects model hidden representations, finding a characteristic block structure in the hidden representations of larger capacity (wider or deeper) models. We demonstrate that this block structure arises when model capacit…

  5. Close
    Deep Learning is Not So Mysterious or Different
    Andrew Gordon Wilson · 2025 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Deep neural networks are often seen as different from other model classes by defying conventional notions of generalization. Popular examples of anomalous generalization behaviour include benign overfitting, double descent, and the success of overparametrization. We argue that these phenomena are not distinct to neural networks, or particularly mysterious. Moreover, this generalization behaviour can be intuitively understood, and rigorously characterized using long-standing generalization frameworks such as PAC-Bayes and countable hypothesis bounds. We present soft inductive biases as a key unifying principle in explaining these phenomena: rather than restricting the hypothesis space to avoi…

  6. Close
    Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks
    Peter W. Battaglia, Jessica B. Hamrick, Victor Bapst et al. · 2018 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular, generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI. The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We argue that combinatorial generalizati…

  7. Close
    Opening the black box of deep learning
    Dian Lei, Xiaoxiao Chen, Jianfei Zhao · 2018 · Machine Learning · AI summary available
    Abstract

    The great success of deep learning shows that its technology contains profound truth, and understanding its internal mechanism not only has important implications for the development of its technology and effective application in various fields, but also provides meaningful insights into the understanding of human brain mechanism. At present, most of the theoretical research on deep learning is based on mathematics. This dissertation proposes that the neural network of deep learning is a physical system, examines deep learning from three different perspectives: microscopic, macroscopic, and physical world views, answers multiple theoretical puzzles in deep learning by using physics principle…

  8. Close
    Why & When Deep Learning Works: Looking Inside Deep Learnings
    Ronny Ronen · 2017 · Machine Learning · Not summarized yet
    Abstract

    The Intel Collaborative Research Institute for Computational Intelligence (ICRI-CI) has been heavily supporting Machine Learning and Deep Learning research from its foundation in 2012. We have asked six leading ICRI-CI Deep Learning researchers to address the challenge of "Why & When Deep Learning works", with the goal of looking inside Deep Learning, providing insights on how deep networks function, and uncovering key observations on their expressiveness, limitations, and potential. The output of this challenge resulted in five papers that address different facets of deep learning. These different facets include a high-level understating of why and when deep networks work (and do not work),…

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.