AI summary · arXiv: 2310.20081v1 · cs.CL

Integrating Summarization and Retrieval for Enhanced Personalization via Large Language Models

Chris Richardson, Yao Zhang, Kellen Gillespie, Sudipta Kar, Arshdeep Singh, Zeynab Raeesy, Omar Zia Khan, Abhinav Sethy

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 30 Oct. 2023 4 pages, International Workshop on Personalized Generative AI (@CIKM 2023) License: CC BY-SA 4.0

The essentials

  • Research focus: Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for personalizing user experiences with Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems
  • Methodology: Using LLMs to generate abstractive summaries of relevant user information offline
  • Retrieval process: Selecting top-k profile entries and combining them with task input and summary for downstream language model fine-tuning
  • Experiment results: Superior performance using FlanT5-base and BM25 retrieval algorithm compared to other methods like Contriever in terms of speed and accuracy
  • Benefits of approach: Addressing challenges such as information loss, lack of user understanding, and cold-start issues effectively

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
, , , , Our research focuses on leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to personalize user experiences with Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems. Personalization is crucial for enhancing the user experience, and we aim to optimize the output of language models by incorporating past user data. To achieve this, we propose a novel approach that involves using LLMs to generate abstractive summaries of relevant user information. This method entails generating these summaries offline using instruction-tuned models such as Vicuna and ChatGPT. These summaries are then stored along with the user data and retrieved at runtime. The retrieval algorithm selects the top-k profile entries and combines them with the task input and summary to provide context for downstream language model fine-tuning. We conducted experiments using the LaMP benchmark dataset, which consists of seven personalization NLP tasks. By utilizing FlanT5-base as our downstream model and the BM25 retrieval algorithm for efficiency, we were able to achieve superior performance compared to other methods like Contriever in terms of speed and accuracy. Our experiments demonstrated that our summary-augmented approach outperformed traditional retrieval augmentation on most tasks in the LaMP benchmark. By combining offline summarization with runtime retrieval, we were able to address challenges such as information loss, lack of user understanding, and cold-start issues effectively. Overall, our research showcases the effectiveness of leveraging LLMs for personalized NLP systems under practical constraints. Our refined approach not only improves performance but also enables real-world systems like voice assistants to benefit from advanced language modeling techniques.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.