Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.00374v1

In this study, the author focuses on the accuracy of stellar distance measurements inferred from parallaxes and proper motions. It is well-known that the accuracy of distance estimates based solely on parallaxes decreases rapidly with increasing distance. However, by incorporating proper motion measurements and considering typical velocities, independent information about stellar distances can be obtained. To achieve this, the author develops a model that takes into account both direction and distance-dependent distributions of stellar velocities in the Galaxy. This model is then used in conjunction with parallax and proper motion data from Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) to infer kinegeometric distances and transverse velocities for stars. To assess the performance of this method, noisy simulations are conducted comparing its accuracy to purely parallax-based (geometric) distances. The results reveal that on average kinegeometric distances are 1.25 times more accurate than geometric ones across the entire Gaia catalogue. However, there is a significant variation in relative performance among different stars; particularly beyond several kiloparsecs (kpc), kinegeometric distances outperform geometric ones considerably. The study finds that kinegeometric distances can be measured with an average accuracy of 19%, while velocities (sqrt[vra^2 + vdec^2]) can be determined with median absolute deviations of 16 km/s. In Gaia DR3 distant stars tend to have smaller kinegeometric distances compared to geometric ones on average; however, the pattern becomes more complex in bulge and disk regions. Looking ahead to Gaia Data Release 5 (DR5), which is expected to provide much more accurate proper motion measurements, a further improvement in distance accuracy by a factor of approximately 1.35 on average is predicted. Despite this improvement, kinegeometric distances are still projected to be 1.25 times more accurate than geometric ones due to being limited by the width of the velocity prior unlike improvements from better parallaxes which are not constrained by the distance prior. In conclusion, this study presents a method for inferring stellar distances and transverse velocities using parallaxes, proper motions and a model of stellar velocities in the Galaxy.

• - Accuracy of distance estimates based solely on parallaxes decreases with increasing distance
• - Proper motion measurements can provide independent information about stellar distances
• - A model is developed to incorporate direction and distance-dependent distributions of stellar velocities
• - Kinegeometric distances are 1.25 times more accurate than geometric distances across the entire Gaia catalogue
• - Kinegeometric distances outperform geometric ones considerably beyond several kiloparsecs
• - Kinegeometric distances have an average accuracy of 19%
• - Velocities can be determined with median absolute deviations of 16 km/s
• - Distant stars tend to have smaller kinegeometric distances compared to geometric ones on average in Gaia DR3, but the pattern is more complex in bulge and disk regions
• - Gaia DR5 is expected to provide much more accurate proper motion measurements, improving distance accuracy by a factor of approximately 1.35 on average
• - Kinegeometric distances are still projected to be 1.25 times more accurate than geometric ones in Gaia DR5 due to being limited by the width of the velocity prior

- Distance estimates based on parallaxes: Parallax is the apparent shift in position of an object when viewed from different angles. Distance estimates based on parallaxes means using this shift to calculate how far away something is. - Proper motion measurements: Proper motion refers to the movement of a star across the sky over time. Proper motion measurements provide information about how far away a star is. - Stellar velocities: Stellar velocities refer to the speed at which stars move. - Kinegeometric distances: Kinegeometric distances are a type of distance measurement that takes into account both direction and distance-dependent distributions of stellar velocities. - Geometric distances: Geometric distances are another type of distance measurement that only considers the direct physical distance between objects.

Exploring the Accuracy of Stellar Distance Measurements Using Parallaxes and Proper Motions

Accurately measuring stellar distances is a crucial part of understanding our universe. While parallaxes have been used for centuries to estimate stellar distances, this method becomes increasingly inaccurate with increasing distance. To address this issue, researchers have developed a new model that incorporates both parallax and proper motion measurements in order to determine kinegeometric distances and transverse velocities for stars. In this article, we will explore the accuracy of this method by looking at its performance on Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) as well as predictions for Gaia Data Release 5 (DR5).

The Model: Combining Parallaxes and Proper Motions

In order to accurately measure stellar distances beyond several kiloparsecs (kpc), it is necessary to consider both direction and distance-dependent distributions of stellar velocities in the Galaxy. This is exactly what the author does in their study; they develop a model that takes into account these factors when inferring kinegeometric distances from parallaxes and proper motions. To assess the performance of this model, noisy simulations are conducted comparing its accuracy to purely parallax-based (geometric) distances. The results reveal that on average kinegeometric distances are 1.25 times more accurate than geometric ones across the entire Gaia catalogue. However, there is significant variation in relative performance among different stars; particularly beyond several kiloparsecs (kpc), kinegeometric distances outperform geometric ones considerably. The study finds that kinegeometric distances can be measured with an average accuracy of 19%, while velocities (sqrt[vra^2 + vdec^2]) can be determined with median absolute deviations of 16 km/s.

Gaia DR3 vs DR5

In Gaia DR3 distant stars tend to have smaller kinegeometric distances compared to geometric ones on average; however, the pattern becomes more complex in bulge and disk regions due to differences between velocity distributions in those areas. Looking ahead to Gaia Data Release 5 (DR5), which is expected to provide much more accurate proper motion measurements, a further improvement in distance accuracy by a factor of approximately 1.35 on average is predicted due solely better parallaxes not constrained by prior information about velocity distribution width unlike improvements from better proper motions which are limited by such prior information.. Despite this improvement, kinegeometric distances are still projected to be 1.25 times more accurate than geometric ones due being limited by the width of the velocity prior unlike improvements from better parallaxes which are not constrained by such prior information .

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study presents a method for inferring stellar distances and transverse velocities using parallaxes, proper motions and a model of stellar velocities in the Galaxy based on data from Gaia DR 3 & 5 releases . It has been shown that incorporating both direction-dependent distributions along with distance-dependent distributions improves accuracy significantly compared solely relying upon parallex measurements alone , especially beyond several kiloparsecs where accuracies were found up 19% for determining distance & 16 km/s for determining transverse velocity respectively . Furthermore , future release data like Gais DR5 promises even greater accuracies thanks largely improved precision provided via better quality data sets .