IC-SECURE: Intelligent System for Assisting Security Experts in Generating Playbooks for Automated Incident Response
Authors: Ryuta Kremer, Prasanna N. Wudali, Satoru Momiyama, Toshinori Araki, Jun Furukawa, Yuval Elovici, Asaf Shabtai
Abstract: Security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) systems ingest alerts from security information and event management (SIEM) system, and then trigger relevant playbooks that automate and orchestrate the execution of a sequence of security activities. SOAR systems have two major limitations: (i) security analysts need to define, create and change playbooks manually, and (ii) the choice between multiple playbooks that could be triggered is based on rules defined by security analysts. To address these limitations, recent studies in the field of artificial intelligence for cybersecurity suggested the task of interactive playbook creation. In this paper, we propose IC-SECURE, an interactive playbook creation solution based on a novel deep learning-based approach that provides recommendations to security analysts during the playbook creation process. IC-SECURE captures the context in the form of alert data and current status of incomplete playbook, required to make reasonable recommendation for next module that should be included in the new playbook being created. We created three evaluation datasets, each of which involved a combination of a set of alert rules and a set of playbooks from a SOAR platform. We evaluated IC-SECURE under various settings, and compared our results with two state-of-the-art recommender system methods. In our evaluation IC-SECURE demonstrated superior performance compared to other methods by consistently recommending the correct security module, achieving precision@1 > 0.8 and recall@3 > 0.92
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.