Autonomous Large Language Model Agents Enabling Intent-Driven Mobile GUI Testing
Authors: Juyeon Yoon, Robert Feldt, Shin Yoo
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper introduces DroidAgent, an autonomous GUI testing agent for Android
- DroidAgent aims to revolutionize GUI testing through semantic, intent-driven approaches
- Traditional GUI testing requires manual selection based on lower-level metrics like code coverage or activity coverage
- DroidAgent leverages Large Language Models and support mechanisms for setting task goals and interacting with Android apps autonomously
- Empirical evaluation using 15 apps from the Themis benchmark showed DroidAgent achieved higher autonomy in performing realistic tasks compared to current techniques
- DroidAgent autonomously created tasks like creating a second account and adding a friend in a messaging app without human intervention
- On average, DroidAgent achieved 61% activity coverage, surpassing existing methods' 51%
- Manual analysis revealed that out of 374 autonomously created tasks, 317 were considered realistic and relevant to app functionalities
- DroidAgent deeply interacted with apps and effectively covered more features
- The study highlights the potential of autonomous agents like DroidAgent in improving efficiency and effectiveness through intent-driven automation powered by Large Language Models
Abstract: GUI testing checks if a software system behaves as expected when users interact with its graphical interface, e.g., testing specific functionality or validating relevant use case scenarios. Currently, deciding what to test at this high level is a manual task since automated GUI testing tools target lower level adequacy metrics such as structural code coverage or activity coverage. We propose DroidAgent, an autonomous GUI testing agent for Android, for semantic, intent-driven automation of GUI testing. It is based on Large Language Models and support mechanisms such as long- and short-term memory. Given an Android app, DroidAgent sets relevant task goals and subsequently tries to achieve them by interacting with the app. Our empirical evaluation of DroidAgent using 15 apps from the Themis benchmark shows that it can set up and perform realistic tasks, with a higher level of autonomy. For example, when testing a messaging app, DroidAgent created a second account and added a first account as a friend, testing a realistic use case, without human intervention. On average, DroidAgent achieved 61% activity coverage, compared to 51% for current state-of-the-art GUI testing techniques. Further, manual analysis shows that 317 out of the 374 autonomously created tasks are realistic and relevant to app functionalities, and also that DroidAgent interacts deeply with the apps and covers more features.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.