Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.10372v2

In their study titled "A Survey of Large Language Models for Code: Evolution, Benchmarking, and Future Trends," authors Zibin Zheng, Kaiwen Ning, Yanlin Wang, Jingwen Zhang, Dewu Zheng, Mingxi Ye and Jiachi Chen conduct a comprehensive survey and analysis of specialized language models designed specifically for software engineering tasks known as Code LLMs. The authors aim to address three key questions: (1) What are the specific LLMs designed for software engineering tasks and how do they relate to each other? (2) Do Code LLMs outperform general LLMs in software engineering tasks? (3) Which LLMs excel in different software engineering tasks? To answer these questions, the authors collect relevant literature and work from major databases and open-source communities resulting in 134 works for analysis. They categorize the Code LLMs based on their publishers and examine their relationships with general LLMs as well as among themselves. Furthermore, they investigate the performance differences between general LLMs and Code LLMs in various software engineering tasks to demonstrate the impact of base models and Code LLMs. The study also focuses on maintaining the performance of LLMs across multiple mainstream benchmarks to identify the best-performing models for each software engineering task. This research not only assists developers of Code LLMs in choosing suitable base models for developing advanced versions but also provides valuable insights for practitioners to better understand key improvement directions for Code LLMs. Overall, this study contributes to bridging the gap in systematic investigation into Code LLMs and their performance. By providing a comprehensive overview of different types of Code LLMs and analyzing their performance compared to general LLMs, it offers valuable guidance for both developers and practitioners in the field of software engineering.

• - The study is titled "A Survey of Large Language Models for Code: Evolution, Benchmarking, and Future Trends"
• - The authors conduct a comprehensive survey and analysis of specialized language models for software engineering tasks known as Code LLMs
• - The authors aim to address three key questions:
• 1. What are the specific LLMs designed for software engineering tasks and how do they relate to each other?
• 2. Do Code LLMs outperform general LLMs in software engineering tasks?
• 3. Which LLMs excel in different software engineering tasks?
• - They collect relevant literature and work from major databases and open-source communities resulting in 134 works for analysis
• - The Code LLMs are categorized based on their publishers and examined for relationships with general LLMs and among themselves
• - Performance differences between general LLMs and Code LLMs in various software engineering tasks are investigated to demonstrate the impact of base models and Code LLMs
• - The study focuses on maintaining the performance of LLMs across multiple mainstream benchmarks to identify the best-performing models for each software engineering task
• - The research assists developers of Code LLMs in choosing suitable base models for developing advanced versions
• - Provides valuable insights for practitioners to better understand key improvement directions for Code LLMs
• - Contributes to bridging the gap in systematic investigation into Code LLMs and their performance
• - Offers valuable guidance for both developers and practitioners in the field of software engineering

The study is about special computer programs that help with writing code for software. The authors want to find out which of these programs are the best and how they compare to other similar programs. They looked at a lot of information from different sources and found 134 programs to analyze. They also compared the performance of these programs in different tasks to see which ones were the most effective. The study helps developers choose the right program for their work and gives useful information for people who use these programs." Definitions- Language Models: Special computer programs that help with writing code for software. - Software Engineering: The process of designing, creating, and maintaining software. - LLMs: Abbreviation for "Language Models." - Benchmarking: Comparing the performance of different programs or systems. - Performance: How well a program or system works in completing a task. - Base Models: The original versions or starting points of a program that can be improved upon. - Practitioners: People who work in a specific field or profession, such as software engineering.

Introduction

Language models have become increasingly popular in recent years due to their ability to generate human-like text. These models are trained on large datasets and can then be used for various natural language processing tasks such as text completion, translation, and summarization. However, with the rise of software engineering tasks, there has been a growing need for specialized language models designed specifically for these tasks. This is where Code LLMs (Large Language Models) come into play. In their research paper titled "A Survey of Large Language Models for Code: Evolution, Benchmarking, and Future Trends," authors Zibin Zheng et al. conduct a comprehensive survey and analysis of Code LLMs. They aim to address three key questions: (1) What are the specific LLMs designed for software engineering tasks and how do they relate to each other? (2) Do Code LLMs outperform general LLMs in software engineering tasks? (3) Which LLMs excel in different software engineering tasks?

Methodology

To answer these questions, the authors collect relevant literature from major databases such as IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Google Scholar, arXiv.org as well as open-source communities like GitHub resulting in 134 works for analysis. They also use keyword-based search queries to ensure that all relevant studies are included in their survey. The collected works were then categorized based on their publishers into four groups: industry-driven code LLMs developed by companies or organizations; academia-driven code LLMs developed by universities or research institutes; hybrid code LLMs developed collaboratively between industry and academia; and community-driven code LLMs developed by open-source communities. Next, the relationships between general LLMs and Code LMMs were examined through a systematic comparison of their architectures, training data sources, pre-training objectives, fine-tuning strategies, and evaluation metrics. The authors also investigated the performance differences between general LLMs and Code LLMs in various software engineering tasks to demonstrate the impact of base models and Code LLMs. Finally, the study focused on maintaining the performance of LLMs across multiple mainstream benchmarks to identify the best-performing models for each software engineering task.

Results

The results of this study provide a comprehensive overview of different types of Code LLMs and their relationships with general LLMs. It was found that most Code LMMs are developed by industry-driven or academia-driven approaches, with only a few being hybrid or community-driven. This suggests that there is still room for collaboration between these different groups in developing more advanced versions of Code LMMs. In terms of performance, it was found that Code LMMs generally outperform general LLMs in software engineering tasks. This highlights the importance of specialized language models for these specific tasks. Additionally, certain Code LMMs were found to excel in particular software engineering tasks such as code completion or bug detection. Furthermore, by comparing the performance across multiple benchmarks, the authors were able to identify which models consistently performed well across different tasks. This information can be valuable for developers looking to improve their existing models or practitioners looking for guidance on which model to use for a specific task.

Discussion

This research paper makes significant contributions to bridging the gap in systematic investigation into Code LMMs and their performance. By providing a comprehensive overview of different types of Code LMMs and analyzing their performance compared to general LLMs, it offers valuable guidance for both developers and practitioners in the field of software engineering. One key takeaway from this study is that while there has been significant progress in developing specialized language models for code-related tasks, there is still room for improvement. Further collaborations between industry and academia could lead to even more advanced versions of Code LMMs that can better assist developers in their work. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of choosing suitable base models for developing Code LMMs. This not only affects the performance of these specialized models but also plays a crucial role in their overall success and adoption by practitioners.

Conclusion

In conclusion, "A Survey of Large Language Models for Code: Evolution, Benchmarking, and Future Trends" provides a comprehensive overview of different types of Code LLMs and their relationships with general LLMs. It also analyzes the performance differences between these models in various software engineering tasks and identifies the best-performing models across multiple benchmarks. This research offers valuable insights for both developers and practitioners in the field of software engineering, paving the way for further advancements in this area.