Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicine

AI-generated keywords: GPT-4 Specialist Models Prompt Engineering Chain-of-Thought Choice Shuffling

AI-generated Key Points

  • Generalist foundation models like GPT-4 have impressive capabilities across various domains and tasks
  • Previous studies on medical competency benchmarks relied on domain-specific training
  • This study aims to explore GPT-4's capabilities on medical challenge benchmarks without specialized training
  • Innovative prompting techniques can unlock deeper specialist capabilities in GPT-4
  • GPT-4 surpasses previous leading results for medical benchmarks when guided by the prompting methods used in this study
  • The prompting strategies explored are general-purpose and do not require domain expertise or curated content from experts
  • Experimental design carefully controls for overfitting during the prompt engineering process
  • Medprompt, a combination of several prompting strategies, achieves state-of-the-art performance on all nine benchmark datasets in the MultiMedQA suite
  • Medprompt outperforms leading specialist models like Med-PaLM 2 while making significantly fewer calls to the model
  • By using Medprompt, there is a 27% reduction in error rate on the MedQA dataset compared to previous best methods with specialist models, surpassing a score of 90% for the first time
  • Medprompt has broad applicability beyond medical problems.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Harsha Nori, Yin Tat Lee, Sheng Zhang, Dean Carignan, Richard Edgar, Nicolo Fusi, Nicholas King, Jonathan Larson, Yuanzhi Li, Weishung Liu, Renqian Luo, Scott Mayer McKinney, Robert Osazuwa Ness, Hoifung Poon, Tao Qin, Naoto Usuyama, Chris White, Eric Horvitz

21 pages, 7 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Generalist foundation models such as GPT-4 have displayed surprising capabilities in a wide variety of domains and tasks. Yet, there is a prevalent assumption that they cannot match specialist capabilities of fine-tuned models. For example, most explorations to date on medical competency benchmarks have leveraged domain-specific training, as exemplified by efforts on BioGPT and Med-PaLM. We build on a prior study of GPT-4's capabilities on medical challenge benchmarks in the absence of special training. Rather than using simple prompting to highlight the model's out-of-the-box capabilities, we perform a systematic exploration of prompt engineering. We find that prompting innovation can unlock deeper specialist capabilities and show that GPT-4 easily tops prior leading results for medical benchmarks. The prompting methods we explore are general purpose, and make no specific use of domain expertise, removing the need for expert-curated content. Our experimental design carefully controls for overfitting during the prompt engineering process. We introduce Medprompt, based on a composition of several prompting strategies. With Medprompt, GPT-4 achieves state-of-the-art results on all nine of the benchmark datasets in the MultiMedQA suite. The method outperforms leading specialist models such as Med-PaLM 2 by a significant margin with an order of magnitude fewer calls to the model. Steering GPT-4 with Medprompt achieves a 27% reduction in error rate on the MedQA dataset over the best methods to date achieved with specialist models and surpasses a score of 90% for the first time. Beyond medical problems, we show the power of Medprompt to generalize to other domains and provide evidence for the broad applicability of the approach via studies of the strategy on exams in electrical engineering, machine learning, philosophy, accounting, law, nursing, and clinical psychology.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Nov. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.16452v1

Generalist foundation models like GPT-4 have shown impressive capabilities across various domains and tasks. However, there is a common belief that they cannot match the specialist abilities of fine-tuned models. Previous studies on medical competency benchmarks have relied on domain-specific training, such as BioGPT and Med-PaLM. In this study, we aim to explore GPT-4's capabilities on medical challenge benchmarks without any specialized training. Instead of using simple prompts to showcase the model's out-of-the-box abilities, we conduct a systematic investigation into prompt engineering. Our findings reveal that innovative prompting techniques can unlock deeper specialist capabilities in GPT-4. We demonstrate that GPT-4 surpasses previous leading results for medical benchmarks by a significant margin when guided by our prompting methods. The prompting strategies we explore are general-purpose and do not require domain expertise or curated content from experts. To ensure reliable results, our experimental design carefully controls for overfitting during the prompt engineering process. We introduce Medprompt, which combines several prompting strategies, and with this approach, GPT-4 achieves state-of-the-art performance on all nine benchmark datasets in the MultiMedQA suite. Remarkably, Medprompt outperforms leading specialist models like Med-PaLM 2 while making significantly fewer calls to the model. By steering GPT-4 with Medprompt, we achieve a 27% reduction in error rate on the MedQA dataset compared to previous best methods with specialist models, surpassing a score of 90% for the first time. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Medprompt has broad applicability beyond medical problems.
Created on 01 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.