LLM4TDD: Best Practices for Test Driven Development Using Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: software systems program synthesis Large Language Models (LLMs) LLM4TDD test-driven development

AI-generated Key Points

  • Our reliance on software systems is increasing in today's society.
  • Program synthesis has emerged as a solution to enhance software correctness by automatically generating code based on specified behavior outlines.
  • Recent advancements in program synthesis focus on integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) to aid in code generation.
  • LLM4TDD involves guiding Large Language Models through an iterative code generation process using a test-driven development methodology.
  • The study explores how attributes such as tests, prompts, and problem complexities impact the effectiveness of LLM4TDD.
  • There is a pressing need for reliable software solutions amidst escalating software failures that cost companies billions annually.
  • Leveraging program synthesis techniques and harnessing the power of LLMs within a human-in-the-loop synthesis framework can streamline code generation processes and reduce errors.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sanyogita Piya, Allison Sullivan

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: In today's society, we are becoming increasingly dependent on software systems. However, we also constantly witness the negative impacts of buggy software. Program synthesis aims to improve software correctness by automatically generating the program given an outline of the expected behavior. For decades, program synthesis has been an active research field, with recent approaches looking to incorporate Large Language Models to help generate code. This paper explores the concept of LLM4TDD, where we guide Large Language Models to generate code iteratively using a test-driven development methodology. We conduct an empirical evaluation using ChatGPT and coding problems from LeetCode to investigate the impact of different test, prompt and problem attributes on the efficacy of LLM4TDD.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Dec. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.04687v1

In today's society, our reliance on software systems is increasing. However, we continue to experience the negative consequences of faulty software. To address this issue, program synthesis has emerged as a solution to enhance software correctness by automatically generating code based on specified behavior outlines. Over the years, program synthesis has been a prominent research area with recent advancements focusing on integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) to aid in code generation. This paper delves into the concept of LLM4TDD and its potential impact on improving software accuracy. LLM4TDD involves guiding Large Language Models through an iterative code generation process using a test-driven development methodology. By incorporating ChatGPT and coding challenges from LeetCode in an empirical evaluation, the study aims to explore how various attributes such as tests, prompts, and problem complexities impact the effectiveness of LLM4TDD. Furthermore, the research highlights the pressing need for reliable software solutions amidst escalating software failures that cost companies billions annually. By leveraging program synthesis techniques and harnessing the power of LLMs within a human-in-the-loop synthesis framework that adapts traditional test-driven development practices, there is potential to streamline code generation processes and reduce errors. Innovative approaches like LLM4TDD not only enhance software accuracy but also offer insights into best practices for Test Driven Development using Large Language Models.
Created on 26 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.