Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.04531v1

The field of has seen significant advancements in , particularly with the development of . These models have shown remarkable improvements in various measurable aspects and introduced new qualitative features as their size continues to increase. However, there is still a need for a better understanding of their capabilities, limitations, and associated risks. To address these challenges, an open has been introduced. The MERA benchmark consists of 21 evaluation tasks across 11 skill domains specifically designed for evaluating foundation models focused on the Russian language. It is structured as a black-box test to prevent data leakage and includes a methodology for evaluating FMs and LMs in zero- and few-shot fixed instruction settings that can be extended to other modalities. The key contributions of this work include presenting a reproducible methodology for evaluating LLMs with a fixed experimental setup, providing 21 textual tasks formatted as instruction datasets covering text sub-modalities such as code, establishing a platform with a scoring system and an open leaderboard for LLM evaluation, and offering baseline solutions including open-source models and human baselines. In comparison to existing benchmarks like GLUE and SuperGLUE which have been criticized for being shallow and potentially outdated due to the emergence of LLMs and FMs, new benchmarks such as BIG-bench, HELM, MT-Bench are proposed to evaluate LLMs in more challenging settings. These benchmarks aim to assess models' generalization abilities across multiple languages, expert knowledge in various domains, coding skills, among other capabilities. Furthermore, there is a shift towards utilizing LLMs as judges for scoring model answers instead of relying solely on automatic metrics or human evaluation. While standard metrics for generative evaluation have been criticized for not being representative enough, benchmarks like INSTRUCTEVAL offer comprehensive evaluation methodologies tailored specifically for instruction-tuned LLMs. Overall, the introduction of MERA aims to guide future research efforts by providing a standardized evaluation procedure that anticipates groundbreaking model features while addressing potential societal drawbacks associated with AI adoption.

• - Significant advancements in the field of
• - Development of foundation models (FMs) and language models (LMs)
• - Improvements in measurable aspects and introduction of new qualitative features
• - Need for better understanding of capabilities, limitations, and risks
• - Introduction of MERA benchmark for evaluating foundation models focused on the Russian language
• - Structured as a black-box test to prevent data leakage
• - Methodology for evaluating FMs and LMs in zero- and few-shot fixed instruction settings
• - Key contributions include reproducible methodology, 21 textual tasks formatted as instruction datasets, scoring system, open leaderboard, baseline solutions
• - Proposals for new benchmarks like BIG-bench, HELM, MT-Bench to evaluate LLMs in challenging settings
• - Shift towards using LLMs as judges for scoring model answers instead of relying solely on automatic metrics or human evaluation
• - Criticisms of standard metrics for generative evaluation leading to the development of benchmarks like INSTRUCTEVAL tailored specifically for instruction-tuned LLMs
• - Aim of MERA to guide future research efforts by providing standardized evaluation procedure

Summary- Scientists have made big progress in a special field. - They created important models to help them understand languages better. - They made things better and added new cool features. - They want to learn more about what the models can do and what they can't do. - A special test was made to check how good the models are at understanding Russian. Definitions- Advancements: Progress or improvements in something. - Foundation Models (FMs): Basic models that serve as building blocks for other models. - Language Models (LMs): Models designed to understand and generate human language. - Benchmark: A standard or point of reference used for evaluation or comparison.

The field of natural language processing (NLP) has seen significant advancements in recent years, particularly with the development of large-scale language models (LLMs). These models have shown remarkable improvements in various measurable aspects and introduced new qualitative features as their size continues to increase. However, there is still a need for a better understanding of their capabilities, limitations, and associated risks. To address these challenges, an open benchmark has been introduced – the MERA benchmark. This benchmark consists of 21 evaluation tasks across 11 skill domains specifically designed for evaluating foundation models (FMs) focused on the Russian language. It is structured as a black-box test to prevent data leakage and includes a methodology for evaluating FMs and LMs in zero- and few-shot fixed instruction settings that can be extended to other modalities. The key contributions of this work include presenting a reproducible methodology for evaluating LLMs with a fixed experimental setup, providing 21 textual tasks formatted as instruction datasets covering text sub-modalities such as code, establishing a platform with a scoring system and an open leaderboard for LLM evaluation, and offering baseline solutions including open-source models and human baselines. In comparison to existing benchmarks like GLUE and SuperGLUE which have been criticized for being shallow and potentially outdated due to the emergence of LLMs and FMs, new benchmarks such as BIG-bench, HELM, MT-Bench are proposed to evaluate LLMs in more challenging settings. These benchmarks aim to assess models' generalization abilities across multiple languages, expert knowledge in various domains, coding skills, among other capabilities. One notable aspect of these new benchmarks is the shift towards utilizing LLMs as judges for scoring model answers instead of relying solely on automatic metrics or human evaluation. While standard metrics for generative evaluation have been criticized for not being representative enough, benchmarks like INSTRUCTEVAL offer comprehensive evaluation methodologies tailored specifically for instruction-tuned LLMs. Overall, the introduction of MERA aims to guide future research efforts by providing a standardized evaluation procedure that anticipates groundbreaking model features while addressing potential societal drawbacks associated with AI adoption. By offering a diverse set of tasks and evaluation methods, MERA provides a more comprehensive understanding of LLM capabilities and limitations, allowing for better-informed decisions in their development and deployment. The MERA benchmark also serves as an important tool for promoting transparency and accountability in the field of NLP. With its open leaderboard and reproducible methodology, researchers can easily compare their models' performance against others and track progress over time. This not only encourages healthy competition but also promotes responsible AI development by highlighting potential biases or weaknesses in models. Moreover, the inclusion of human baselines in the benchmark allows for a fair comparison between LLMs and human performance. This is crucial as LLMs are often touted as surpassing human-level performance, but it is essential to understand where they excel and where they fall short compared to humans. In conclusion, the MERA benchmark is a significant contribution to the field of NLP research. It addresses key challenges in evaluating LLMs by providing a standardized evaluation procedure that considers various aspects such as generalization abilities, expert knowledge, coding skills, among others. As AI continues to advance at an unprecedented pace, benchmarks like MERA will play an essential role in guiding responsible development and deployment of these powerful language models.