Finding Privacy-relevant Source Code
AI-generated Key Points
- Privacy code review is important for data protection compliance
- Limited resources make privacy code review challenging
- Authors propose a new approach focusing on privacy-relevant methods in source code
- Static analysis is used to identify these methods based on their occurrences in commonly used libraries
- Methods are ranked by frequency of invocation with actual personal data in popular GitHub applications
- Approach identifies fewer than 5% of methods as privacy-relevant, reducing time required for code reviews
- Approach validated through case studies on Signal Desktop and Cal.com
- Approach applied to 100 open-source applications, analyzing prevalence and types of personal data processing
- Small percentage of application methods invoke privacy-relevant methods and process personal data or PII
- Automated approach enhances efficiency and effectiveness of privacy code reviews
Authors: Feiyang Tang, Bjarte M. Østvold
Abstract: Privacy code review is a critical process that enables developers and legal experts to ensure compliance with data protection regulations. However, the task is challenging due to resource constraints. To address this, we introduce the concept of privacy-relevant methods - specific methods in code that are directly involved in the processing of personal data. We then present an automated approach to assist in code review by identifying and categorizing these privacy-relevant methods in source code. Using static analysis, we identify a set of methods based on their occurrences in 50 commonly used libraries. We then rank these methods according to their frequency of invocation with actual personal data in the top 30 GitHub applications. The highest-ranked methods are the ones we designate as privacy-relevant in practice. For our evaluation, we examined 100 open-source applications and found that our approach identifies fewer than 5% of the methods as privacy-relevant for personal data processing. This reduces the time required for code reviews. Case studies on Signal Desktop and Cal.com further validate the effectiveness of our approach in aiding code reviewers to produce enhanced reports that facilitate compliance with privacy regulations.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.