Self-Rewarding Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Self-Rewarding Language Models Superhuman Agents Deep Policy Optimization Instruction Following Ability Reward Generation Capability

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Achieving superhuman agents through the use of superhuman feedback for training
  • Training reward models based on human preferences is limited by human performance levels and frozen reward models
  • Proposal of Self-Rewarding Language Models where the language model provides its own rewards through LLM-as-a-Judge prompting during training
  • Improvement in instruction following ability and generation of high-quality rewards during Iterative DPO training
  • Impressive results achieved on Llama 2 70B, outperforming existing systems on the AlpacaEval 2.0 leaderboard
  • Possibilities for models to continuously enhance instruction following ability and reward generation capability through self-rewarding mechanisms
  • Potential for language models to surpass human performance levels and improve their own capabilities using these mechanisms
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jing Xu, Jason Weston

Abstract: We posit that to achieve superhuman agents, future models require superhuman feedback in order to provide an adequate training signal. Current approaches commonly train reward models from human preferences, which may then be bottlenecked by human performance level, and secondly these separate frozen reward models cannot then learn to improve during LLM training. In this work, we study Self-Rewarding Language Models, where the language model itself is used via LLM-as-a-Judge prompting to provide its own rewards during training. We show that during Iterative DPO training that not only does instruction following ability improve, but also the ability to provide high-quality rewards to itself. Fine-tuning Llama 2 70B on three iterations of our approach yields a model that outperforms many existing systems on the AlpacaEval 2.0 leaderboard, including Claude 2, Gemini Pro, and GPT-4 0613. While only a preliminary study, this work opens the door to the possibility of models that can continually improve in both axes.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.10020v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Self-Rewarding Language Models" explores the concept of achieving superhuman agents through the use of superhuman feedback for training. The current approach involves training reward models based on human preferences, but this method is limited by human performance levels and frozen reward models that cannot improve during language model (LLM) training. To overcome these limitations, the authors propose Self-Rewarding Language Models where the language model itself provides its own rewards through LLM-as-a-Judge prompting during training. The study demonstrates that during Iterative DPO (Deep Policy Optimization) training, not only does the instruction following ability of the language model improve, but it also becomes capable of generating high-quality rewards for itself. Through three iterations of their approach on Llama 2 70B, impressive results are achieved. The resulting model outperforms several existing systems on the AlpacaEval 2.0 leaderboard including Claude 2, Gemini Pro, and GPT-4 0613. While considered a preliminary study, this work opens up possibilities for models that can continuously enhance both their instruction following ability and reward generation capability through self-rewarding mechanisms. In the future, language models may surpass human performance levels and continually improve their own capabilities by leveraging these mechanisms.
Created on 20 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.