Transfer Learning for Text Diffusion Models

AI-generated keywords: Transfer Learning Text Diffusion Models Autoregressive Decoding Large Language Models Training and Deployment

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Text diffusion models are explored as an alternative to autoregressive (AR) decoding in training and deploying large language models (LLMs)
  • Training a decoder-only model with a prefix LM objective yields the best or near-best results across multiple tasks
  • Text diffusion models outperform AR models in code synthesis and extractive QA when trained from scratch
  • Adapting AR models to use diffusion decoding through the AR2Diff procedure results in quality gains
  • Text diffusion offers significant advantages in terms of speed compared to AR decoding for generating long texts
  • Further research is needed to explore the potential of text diffusion and identify effective setups
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Kehang Han, Kathleen Kenealy, Aditya Barua, Noah Fiedel, Noah Constant

Abstract: In this report, we explore the potential for text diffusion to replace autoregressive (AR) decoding for the training and deployment of large language models (LLMs). We are particularly interested to see whether pretrained AR models can be transformed into text diffusion models through a lightweight adaptation procedure we call ``AR2Diff''. We begin by establishing a strong baseline setup for training text diffusion models. Comparing across multiple architectures and pretraining objectives, we find that training a decoder-only model with a prefix LM objective is best or near-best across several tasks. Building on this finding, we test various transfer learning setups for text diffusion models. On machine translation, we find that text diffusion underperforms the standard AR approach. However, on code synthesis and extractive QA, we find diffusion models trained from scratch outperform AR models in many cases. We also observe quality gains from AR2Diff -- adapting AR models to use diffusion decoding. These results are promising given that text diffusion is relatively underexplored and can be significantly faster than AR decoding for long text generation.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.17181v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their report titled "Transfer Learning for Text Diffusion Models," authors Kehang Han, Kathleen Kenealy, Aditya Barua, Noah Fiedel, and Noah Constant explore the potential of using text diffusion as an alternative to autoregressive (AR) decoding in training and deploying large language models (LLMs). They establish a strong baseline setup for training text diffusion models by comparing different architectures and pretraining objectives. Their findings show that training a decoder-only model with a prefix LM objective yields the best or near-best results across multiple tasks. The authors then test various transfer learning setups for text diffusion models and find that while it may underperform in machine translation compared to the standard AR approach, it outperforms AR models in code synthesis and extractive QA when trained from scratch. Furthermore, they observe quality gains from adapting AR models to use diffusion decoding through the AR2Diff procedure. These results are promising as text diffusion offers significant advantages in terms of speed compared to AR decoding for generating long texts. Overall, this report provides valuable insights into the potential of text diffusion as a replacement for autoregressive decoding in training and deploying large language models. It highlights effective setups while also identifying areas where further research is needed. is explored as an alternative to in of . The authors' experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of certain setups while also highlighting areas where further research is needed.
Created on 08 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.