Flora: Low-Rank Adapters Are Secretly Gradient Compressors

AI-generated keywords: Low-rank adaptation LoRA Flora Random projection Memory optimization

AI-generated Key Points

  • LoRA method aims to reduce memory usage in large neural networks by training fewer parameters and decreasing optimization states.
  • Flora is introduced as a novel approach to address limitations of LoRA, leveraging random projection to achieve high-rank updates while maintaining model performance.
  • Flora allows for sublinear space complexity in storing optimization states.
  • Experiments involve fine-tuning pre-trained models using gradient accumulation and training from scratch with momentum techniques.
  • Effectiveness is evaluated using ROUGE scores for summarization tasks and SacreBLEU scores for translation tasks.
  • Peak memory usage is monitored, and comparisons are made with competing approaches such as Adafactor.
  • Experiments are conducted across different model architectures (T5 and GPT-2 series) on tasks like summarization and translation.
  • Efficiency of Flora in optimizing memory usage without compromising model performance is demonstrated through testing various rank values for small and large models, showing significant improvements compared to existing methods.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yongchang Hao, Yanshuai Cao, Lili Mou

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Despite large neural networks demonstrating remarkable abilities to complete different tasks, they require excessive memory usage to store the optimization states for training. To alleviate this, the low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is proposed to reduce the optimization states by training fewer parameters. However, LoRA restricts overall weight update matrices to be low-rank, limiting the model performance. In this work, we investigate the dynamics of LoRA and identify that it can be approximated by a random projection. Based on this observation, we propose Flora, which is able to achieve high-rank updates by resampling the projection matrices while enjoying the sublinear space complexity of optimization states. We conduct experiments across different tasks and model architectures to verify the effectiveness of our approach.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.03293v1

In this study, we delve into the dynamics of the low-rank adaptation (LoRA) method and introduce Flora as a novel approach to address its limitations. LoRA aims to reduce memory usage in large neural networks by training fewer parameters and has shown promise in decreasing optimization states. However, it comes with the drawback of limiting model performance due to its restriction on weight update matrices. To overcome this issue, Flora leverages random projection to approximate LoRA and achieve high-rank updates by resampling projection matrices. This allows for maintaining model performance while enjoying sublinear space complexity in storing optimization states. Our experiments involve fine-tuning a pre-trained model using gradient accumulation and training from scratch with momentum techniques. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach using ROUGE scores for summarization tasks and SacreBLEU scores for translation tasks. Additionally, we monitor peak memory usage and compare our method with competing approaches such as Adafactor. We conduct experiments across different model architectures, including T5 and GPT-2 series models, on tasks like summarization and translation. By testing various rank values for small and large models, we demonstrate the efficiency of Flora in optimizing memory usage without compromising model performance. Our results show significant improvements in both memory savings and task performance compared to existing methods.
Created on 19 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.