In deep reinforcement learning, a pruned network is a good network

AI-generated keywords: Deep Reinforcement Learning Network Parameters Sparse Training Techniques Gradual Magnitude Pruning Performance Optimization

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study by Johan Obando-Ceron, Aaron Courville, and Pablo Samuel Castro focuses on challenges faced by deep reinforcement learning agents in utilizing network parameters effectively.
  • Gradual magnitude pruning enhances parameter effectiveness and leads to networks that outperform traditional ones.
  • Pruned networks achieve remarkable performance with only a fraction of full network parameters due to the "scaling law" phenomenon.
  • Focus on four games - BeamRider, Breakout, Enduro, and VideoPinball - with analyses on Q estimates variance, network parameters norm, Q-values norm, effective rank of the matrix, and fraction of dormant neurons.
  • Pruning reduces variance and norms of parameters while increasing the effective rank due to normalization effects and increased network plasticity.
  • Comparison against weight decay (WD) and L2 regularization highlights unique benefits of gradual magnitude pruning in enhancing parameter effectiveness and improving overall network performance.
  • Importance of exploring alternative pruning schedules for further optimization in deep reinforcement learning networks is emphasized.
  • Leveraging sparse training methods like gradual magnitude pruning can lead to significant advancements in network efficiency and performance across various tasks and environments.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Johan Obando-Ceron, Aaron Courville, Pablo Samuel Castro

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Recent work has shown that deep reinforcement learning agents have difficulty in effectively using their network parameters. We leverage prior insights into the advantages of sparse training techniques and demonstrate that gradual magnitude pruning enables agents to maximize parameter effectiveness. This results in networks that yield dramatic performance improvements over traditional networks and exhibit a type of "scaling law", using only a small fraction of the full network parameters.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.12479v1

The study by Johan Obando-Ceron, Aaron Courville, and Pablo Samuel Castro delves into the challenges faced by deep reinforcement learning agents in effectively utilizing their network parameters. Through gradual magnitude pruning, the researchers demonstrate how this approach can greatly enhance parameter effectiveness and lead to networks that outperform traditional ones. This unique "scaling law" phenomenon is observed as these pruned networks achieve remarkable performance with only a fraction of the full network parameters. The study focuses on four different games - BeamRider, Breakout, Enduro, and VideoPinball - and conducts various analyses to measure the impact of pruning on Q estimates variance, network parameters norm, Q-values norm, effective rank of the matrix, and fraction of dormant neurons. The results show that pruning reduces variance and norms of parameters while increasing the effective rank of parameters due to normalization effects and increased network plasticity. By comparing their method against existing techniques like weight decay (WD) and L2 regularization, the researchers highlight the unique benefits offered by gradual magnitude pruning in enhancing parameter effectiveness and improving overall network performance. This study emphasizes the importance of exploring alternative pruning schedules for further optimization in deep reinforcement learning networks. It also suggests that leveraging sparse training methods such as gradual magnitude pruning can lead to significant advancements in network efficiency and performance across various tasks and environments.
Created on 06 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.