Running summarizing tools on a new article

This is the first time this article is requested and our AI summarizing tools have never been run on it. We can run our tools now if you click on the button "Run" donw the page but first make sure that it is the right article.


CriticBench: Evaluating Large Language Models as Critic

Tian Lan, Wenwei Zhang, Chen Xu, Heyan Huang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen, Xian-ling Mao

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Critique ability are crucial in the scalable oversight and self-improvement of Large Language Models (LLMs). While many recent studies explore the critique ability of LLMs to judge and refine flaws in generations, how to comprehensively and reliably measure the critique abilities of LLMs is under-explored. This paper introduces \shortname, a novel benchmark designed to comprehensively and reliably evaluate four key critique ability dimensions of LLMs: feedback, comparison, refinement and meta-feedback. \shortname~encompasses nine diverse tasks, each assessing the LLMs' ability to critique responses at varying levels of quality granularity. Our extensive evaluations of open-source and closed-source LLMs reveal intriguing relationships between the critique ability and tasks, response qualities, and model scales. Datasets, resources and evaluation toolkit for \shortname~will be publicly released at \url{https://github.com/gmftbyGMFTBY/CriticBench}.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Feb. 2024