Approaching Human-Level Forecasting with Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Retrieval-augmented language model Forecasting Fine-tuning Data augmentation Optimization

AI-generated Key Points

  • Researchers focus on optimizing a retrieval-augmented language model system for accurate forecasting of future events
  • Aim to determine if language models can match the performance of competitive human forecasters
  • Process involves fine-tuning a reasoning model by collecting a large dataset of forecasts and selecting subsets where the model outperforms human crowds
  • Data generation for fine-tuning involves running the system at each retrieval date in the schedule with multiple configurations for data augmentation
  • Optimization procedure includes generating candidate outputs per input, selecting best reasoning-prediction pairs, and fine-tuning the model on strong forecasts
  • Fine-tuning data structure consists of inputs containing questions, descriptions, resolution criteria, and summarized articles; target outputs comprise reasoning and predictions
  • Acknowledgments to individuals who contributed helpful discussions and feedback on an early draft of the paper; support from various institutions is also acknowledged
  • Retrieval system detailed in four steps: search query generation, news retrieval using APIs, relevance filtering and re-ranking, text summarization
  • Goal is to gather historical articles relevant to forecasting tasks
  • Researchers strive to enhance system's performance for accurate forecasting at scale through rigorous optimization procedures and data collection efforts
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Danny Halawi, Fred Zhang, Chen Yueh-Han, Jacob Steinhardt

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Forecasting future events is important for policy and decision making. In this work, we study whether language models (LMs) can forecast at the level of competitive human forecasters. Towards this goal, we develop a retrieval-augmented LM system designed to automatically search for relevant information, generate forecasts, and aggregate predictions. To facilitate our study, we collect a large dataset of questions from competitive forecasting platforms. Under a test set published after the knowledge cut-offs of our LMs, we evaluate the end-to-end performance of our system against the aggregates of human forecasts. On average, the system nears the crowd aggregate of competitive forecasters, and in some settings surpasses it. Our work suggests that using LMs to forecast the future could provide accurate predictions at scale and help to inform institutional decision making.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.18563v1

The researchers in this study focus on optimizing a retrieval-augmented language model system for accurate forecasting of future events. They aim to determine if language models can match the performance of competitive human forecasters. The process involves fine-tuning a reasoning model by collecting a large dataset of forecasts and selecting subsets where the model outperforms human crowds. To generate data for fine-tuning, the system runs at each retrieval date in the schedule and on each question in the training set with multiple configurations for data augmentation. The optimization procedure includes generating candidate outputs per input by trying different scratchpad prompts, selecting the best reasoning-prediction pairs, and fine-tuning the model on strong forecasts. The fine-tuning data structure consists of inputs containing questions, descriptions, resolution criteria, and summarized articles; and target outputs comprising reasoning and predictions. This process aims to teach the model which reasoning to apply in specific contexts. Acknowledgments are extended to individuals who contributed helpful discussions and feedback on an early draft of the paper. Support from various institutions is also acknowledged. The retrieval system is detailed in four steps: search query generation, news retrieval using APIs, relevance filtering and re-ranking, and text summarization. The goal is to gather historical articles relevant to forecasting tasks. Through rigorous optimization procedures and data collection efforts , the researchers strive to enhance their system's performance for accurate forecasting at scale.
Created on 12 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.