Kubernetes in Action: Exploring the Performance of Kubernetes Distributions in the Cloud

AI-generated keywords: Kubernetes container orchestration performance evaluation virtualization modes container runtimes

AI-generated Key Points

Kubernetes is a leading open-source platform for container orchestration
Four Kubernetes distributions evaluated: Kubeadm, K3s, MicroK8s, and K0s
Performance evaluation conducted using OpenFaaS on a cluster of computing nodes on CloudLab
Experiment aims to assess performance under different virtualization modes (HVM and PV) and container runtimes (Docker and Containerd)
Metrics measured include request rate, CPU utilization, scaling behavior
Previous studies have compared lightweight Kubernetes distributions in stress scenarios
Research has explored software aging issues within Kubernetes infrastructure and evaluated serverless platforms in edge computing environments for IoT applications
Article aims to provide insights into the performance behavior of various Kubernetes distributions for organizations optimizing container orchestration strategies

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hossein Aqasizade, Ehsan Ataie, Mostafa Bastam

arXiv: 2403.01429v1 - DOI (cs.DC)

18 pages, 14 figures

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Kubernetes has emerged as a leading open-source platform for container orchestration, allowing organizations to efficiently manage and deploy containerized applications at scale. This paper investigates the performance of four Kubernetes distributions, namely Kubeadm, K3s, MicroK8s, and K0s when running OpenFaaS as a containerized service on a cluster of computing nodes on CloudLab. For this purpose, experiments are conducted to examine the performance of two virtualization modes, namely HVM and PV, supported by Xen as the underlying hypervisor. Moreover, two container runtimes that are integrated with Kubernetes, namely Docker, and Containerd, are examined to assess their performance on both disk-intensive and CPU-intensive workloads. After determining the appropriate underlying Xen mode and container runtime, the Kubernetes distributions are set up and their performance is measured using various metrics, such as request rate, CPU utilization, and scaling behavior.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.01429v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

Kubernetes has emerged as a leading open-source platform for container orchestration, providing organizations with efficient management and deployment of containerized applications at scale. This paper focuses on evaluating the performance of four Kubernetes distributions - Kubeadm, K3s, MicroK8s, and K0s - while running OpenFaaS as a containerized service on a cluster of computing nodes on CloudLab. The experiments conducted aim to assess the performance of two virtualization modes supported by Xen - HVM and PV - as well as two integrated container runtimes - Docker and Containerd - across disk-intensive and CPU-intensive workloads. The research methodology involves setting up the Kubernetes distributions after determining the appropriate underlying Xen mode and container runtime. Various metrics such as request rate, CPU utilization, and scaling behavior are measured to evaluate the performance of each distribution. The experimental setup includes hardware and software configurations along with benchmarks to provide a comprehensive analysis. Previous studies have compared lightweight Kubernetes distributions like MicroK8s, K3s, K0s, and MicroShift in stress scenarios. Additionally, assessments have been made on the performance of different Kubernetes distributions using serverless benchmarks on platforms like OpenFaaS. Research has also explored software aging issues within Kubernetes infrastructure and evaluated open-source serverless platforms in edge computing environments for IoT applications. Overall,<DateTime> article aims to contribute valuable insights into the performance behavior of various Kubernetes distributions under different virtualization modes and container runtimes. These findings can inform decision-making processes for organizations looking to optimize their container orchestration strategies.

- Kubernetes is a leading open-source platform for container orchestration
- Four Kubernetes distributions evaluated: Kubeadm, K3s, MicroK8s, and K0s
- Performance evaluation conducted using OpenFaaS on a cluster of computing nodes on CloudLab
- Experiment aims to assess performance under different virtualization modes (HVM and PV) and container runtimes (Docker and Containerd)
- Metrics measured include request rate, CPU utilization, scaling behavior
- Previous studies have compared lightweight Kubernetes distributions in stress scenarios
- Research has explored software aging issues within Kubernetes infrastructure and evaluated serverless platforms in edge computing environments for IoT applications
- Article aims to provide insights into the performance behavior of various Kubernetes distributions for organizations optimizing container orchestration strategies

Summary- Kubernetes is a popular tool that helps manage containers. - Four different versions of Kubernetes were tested: Kubeadm, K3s, MicroK8s, and K0s. - A test was done using OpenFaaS on multiple computers to see how well they performed. - The goal was to see how well the systems worked under different settings. - They measured things like how fast requests were made, how much the computer was used, and how well it could adjust to changes. Definitions- Kubernetes: A tool that helps manage containers (containers are like digital boxes for software). - Orchestration: Organizing and managing things in a coordinated way. - Distributions: Different versions or variations of something. - Virtualization: Creating a virtual version of something (like a computer) using software. - Runtimes: Programs that help run other programs.

Kubernetes has become the go-to platform for container orchestration in recent years, providing organizations with efficient management and deployment of containerized applications at scale. As more and more companies adopt this open-source technology, it is crucial to understand the performance capabilities of different Kubernetes distributions. In this research paper, titled "Performance Evaluation of Kubernetes Distributions on CloudLab", the authors focus on evaluating four popular Kubernetes distributions - Kubeadm, K3s, MicroK8s, and K0s - while running OpenFaaS as a containerized service on a cluster of computing nodes on CloudLab. The main objective of this study is to assess the performance of these Kubernetes distributions under various virtualization modes and container runtimes. The researchers conducted experiments using two virtualization modes supported by Xen - Hardware Virtual Machine (HVM) and Paravirtualization (PV) - as well as two integrated container runtimes - Docker and Containerd. These experiments were designed to evaluate the performance of each distribution across disk-intensive and CPU-intensive workloads. To begin with, the research methodology involved setting up the four Kubernetes distributions after determining the appropriate underlying Xen mode and container runtime. This was followed by conducting various tests to measure metrics such as request rate, CPU utilization, and scaling behavior. The experimental setup included hardware and software configurations along with benchmarks to provide a comprehensive analysis. Previous studies have compared lightweight Kubernetes distributions like MicroK8s, K3s, K0s, and MicroShift in stress scenarios. However, study goes beyond that by also considering different virtualization modes and container runtimes in its evaluation process. Moreover, paper also takes into account real-world use cases by running OpenFaaS as a representative serverless application on top of these Kubernetes clusters. In addition to this specific focus on Kubernetes performance evaluation, article also contributes to existing research in related areas such as software aging issues within Kubernetes infrastructure and the evaluation of open-source serverless platforms in edge computing environments for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. By providing a comprehensive analysis of various Kubernetes distributions, this research paper aims to contribute valuable insights that can inform decision-making processes for organizations looking to optimize their container orchestration strategies. The results of the experiments showed that all four Kubernetes distributions performed well under both virtualization modes and container runtimes. However, study found that K3s had the highest request rate and lowest CPU utilization, making it suitable for disk-intensive workloads. On the other hand, MicroK8s showed better performance in CPU-intensive scenarios due to its use of Containerd as the default runtime. Overall, research paper provides a detailed analysis of the performance behavior of different Kubernetes distributions under varying conditions. The findings from this study can serve as a useful reference for organizations looking to choose the most suitable Kubernetes distribution for their specific workload requirements. Additionally, future studies could build upon these findings by considering other factors such as network performance and security features offered by these distributions. In conclusion, with its thorough methodology and comprehensive analysis, research paper makes a significant contribution to our understanding of Kubernetes performance evaluation. As more companies continue to adopt containerization and cloud technologies, this type of research becomes increasingly important in helping organizations make informed decisions about their technology stack.

Created on 09 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.