CURATRON: Complete Robust Preference Data for Robust Alignment of Large Language Models
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors Son The Nguyen, Niranjan Uma Naresh, and Theja Tulabandhula focus on aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values through preference learning (PL).
- Their method aims to recalibrate values within incomplete and corrupted preference datasets to enhance LLMs' resilience against ethical challenges.
- Central to their approach is a guaranteed polynomial time ranking algorithm that improves existing models like the classic Bradley--Terry--Luce (BTL) model.
- They introduce an algorithm capable of provably recovering an {\epsilon}-optimal ranking with high probability while accommodating perturbed pairwise comparison results per model response.
- The authors demonstrate robust recovery outcomes even in scenarios with partial data, showcasing adaptability and effectiveness of their proposed algorithms.
- Through rigorous experimentation, they validate that their methods exhibit resilience against adversarial noise and unobserved comparisons across general preference dataset settings and those specific to LLMs.
- This research significantly advances the development and scaling of more reliable and ethically aligned AI models by enhancing the dataset curation pipeline capabilities.
Authors: Son The Nguyen, Niranjan Uma Naresh, Theja Tulabandhula
Abstract: This paper addresses the challenges of aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values via preference learning (PL), with a focus on the issues of incomplete and corrupted data in preference datasets. We propose a novel method for robustly and completely recalibrating values within these datasets to enhance LLMs resilience against the issues. In particular, we devise a guaranteed polynomial time ranking algorithm that robustifies several existing models, such as the classic Bradley--Terry--Luce (BTL) (Bradley and Terry, 1952) model and certain generalizations of it. To the best of our knowledge, our present work is the first to propose an algorithm that provably recovers an {\epsilon}-optimal ranking with high probability while allowing as large as O(n) perturbed pairwise comparison results per model response. Furthermore, we show robust recovery results in the partially observed setting. Our experiments confirm that our algorithms handle adversarial noise and unobserved comparisons well in both general and LLM preference dataset settings. This work contributes to the development and scaling of more reliable and ethically aligned AI models by equipping the dataset curation pipeline with the ability to handle missing and maliciously manipulated inputs.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.