Exploring LLM-based Agents for Root Cause Analysis
Authors: Devjeet Roy, Xuchao Zhang, Rashi Bhave, Chetan Bansal, Pedro Las-Casas, Rodrigo Fonseca, Saravan Rajmohan
AI-generated Key Points
- Roy et al. presented a study on incident management within cloud-based software systems at Conference’17 in July 2017 in Washington, DC, USA.
- Incident management plays a crucial role in the software development lifecycle due to the increasing complexity of these systems.
- Root cause analysis (RCA) is identified as a key aspect of incident management that requires specialized knowledge and experience from on-call engineers.
- Manual RCA is time-consuming and burdensome for engineers, prompting Roy et al. to propose automation as a solution to streamline the process.
- The ReAct agent introduced by Roy et al. utilizes retrieval tools to enhance the diagnostic capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for RCA.
- Empirical evaluation using real-world production incidents from Microsoft shows that ReAct performs competitively with strong retrieval and reasoning baselines while improving factual accuracy significantly.
- Discussions associated with incident reports do not yield substantial performance enhancements according to semantic metrics.
- A case study conducted with a team at Microsoft demonstrates how integrating external diagnostic services can overcome limitations observed in prior studies and provide practical insights for implementing such systems in operational settings.
Abstract: The growing complexity of cloud based software systems has resulted in incident management becoming an integral part of the software development lifecycle. Root cause analysis (RCA), a critical part of the incident management process, is a demanding task for on-call engineers, requiring deep domain knowledge and extensive experience with a team's specific services. Automation of RCA can result in significant savings of time, and ease the burden of incident management on on-call engineers. Recently, researchers have utilized Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform RCA, and have demonstrated promising results. However, these approaches are not able to dynamically collect additional diagnostic information such as incident related logs, metrics or databases, severely restricting their ability to diagnose root causes. In this work, we explore the use of LLM based agents for RCA to address this limitation. We present a thorough empirical evaluation of a ReAct agent equipped with retrieval tools, on an out-of-distribution dataset of production incidents collected at Microsoft. Results show that ReAct performs competitively with strong retrieval and reasoning baselines, but with highly increased factual accuracy. We then extend this evaluation by incorporating discussions associated with incident reports as additional inputs for the models, which surprisingly does not yield significant performance improvements. Lastly, we conduct a case study with a team at Microsoft to equip the ReAct agent with tools that give it access to external diagnostic services that are used by the team for manual RCA. Our results show how agents can overcome the limitations of prior work, and practical considerations for implementing such a system in practice.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.