RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAG

AI-generated keywords: Natural Language Processing

AI-generated Key Points

Pretraining Large Language Models (LLMs) on extensive textual data is a standard practice in natural language processing.
Incorporating new knowledge into pretrained LLMs is crucial for various downstream applications.
Methods for integrating new knowledge include RAG-based prompting and fine-tuning.
Retrieval Augmented FineTuning (RAFT) offers a novel training recipe to enhance reasoning capabilities within specific domains.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tianjun Zhang, Shishir G. Patil, Naman Jain, Sheng Shen, Matei Zaharia, Ion Stoica, Joseph E. Gonzalez

arXiv: 2403.10131v1 - DOI (cs.CL)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Pretraining Large Language Models (LLMs) on large corpora of textual data is now a standard paradigm. When using these LLMs for many downstream applications, it is common to additionally bake in new knowledge (e.g., time-critical news, or private domain knowledge) into the pretrained model either through RAG-based-prompting, or fine-tuning. However, the optimal methodology for the model to gain such new knowledge remains an open question. In this paper, we present Retrieval Augmented FineTuning (RAFT), a training recipe that improves the model's ability to answer questions in a "open-book" in-domain settings. In RAFT, given a question, and a set of retrieved documents, we train the model to ignore those documents that don't help in answering the question, which we call, distractor documents. RAFT accomplishes this by citing verbatim the right sequence from the relevant document that would help answer the question. This coupled with RAFT's chain-of-thought-style response helps improve the model's ability to reason. In domain-specific RAG, RAFT consistently improves the model's performance across PubMed, HotpotQA, and Gorilla datasets, presenting a post-training recipe to improve pre-trained LLMs to in-domain RAG. RAFT's code and demo are open-sourced at github.com/ShishirPatil/gorilla.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.10131v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

, , , , In the realm of natural language processing, pretraining Large Language Models (LLMs) on extensive textual data has become a standard practice. These LLMs are often utilized in various downstream applications, where incorporating new knowledge into the pretrained model is crucial. This additional knowledge could range from time-sensitive news updates to domain-specific information. The methods commonly employed for integrating this new knowledge include RAG-based prompting and fine-tuning. However, the most effective approach for imbuing these models with fresh knowledge remains an open question. <nl> Natural language processing has become a standard practice for pretraining Large Language Models (LLMs). Incorporating new knowledge into these models is crucial for their use in downstream applications. Retrieval Augmented FineTuning (RAFT) offers a novel training recipe to enhance reasoning capabilities within specific domains by disregarding irrelevant documents and extracting relevant information verbatim from appropriate sources.

- Pretraining Large Language Models (LLMs) on extensive textual data is a standard practice in natural language processing.
- Incorporating new knowledge into pretrained LLMs is crucial for various downstream applications.
- Methods for integrating new knowledge include RAG-based prompting and fine-tuning.
- Retrieval Augmented FineTuning (RAFT) offers a novel training recipe to enhance reasoning capabilities within specific domains.

Summary1. Big computers learn words from lots of stories to help them talk better. 2. Adding new things they learn is important for using them in different ways. 3. Ways to add new things include asking questions and practicing more. 4. A special way called RAFT helps computers get smarter at solving problems. 5. RAFT makes computers think better in certain areas by training them differently. Definitions- Pretraining: Teaching a computer lots of information before it starts working on specific tasks. - Language Models (LLMs): Computers that understand and generate human language. - Downstream applications: Using the knowledge gained from pretraining for specific tasks or purposes. - Prompting: Asking questions or giving instructions to guide the learning process. - Fine-tuning: Making small adjustments to improve performance on a particular task or domain. - Retrieval Augmented FineTuning (RAFT): A method that combines retrieval techniques with fine-tuning to enhance reasoning abilities within specific domains.

Introduction

In recent years, natural language processing has seen a surge in the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for various tasks such as text generation, question-answering, and language translation. These models are typically pre-trained on large amounts of textual data to learn general linguistic patterns and structures. However, incorporating new knowledge into these pretrained models is crucial for their effective use in real-world applications. A common approach for integrating new knowledge into LLMs is through RAG-based prompting or fine-tuning techniques. However, a recent research paper titled "Retrieval Augmented FineTuning: Improving Knowledge Integration in Large Language Models" proposes a novel training recipe called RAFT that aims to enhance reasoning capabilities within specific domains by disregarding irrelevant documents and extracting relevant information verbatim from appropriate sources.

The Need for Knowledge Integration

Pretrained LLMs have shown impressive performance on various natural language processing tasks. However, they lack the ability to incorporate new knowledge effectively. This becomes problematic when dealing with time-sensitive information or domain-specific data that may not be present in the original pretraining corpus. For example, if we want an LLM to generate news headlines based on current events, it needs access to up-to-date information that may not have been included in its initial training data. Similarly, if we want an LLM to answer questions related to a specific field like medicine or law, it needs access to domain-specific knowledge that may not be present in its pretrained model. Therefore, there is a need for methods that can effectively integrate new knowledge into pretrained LLMs without compromising their overall performance.

RAG-based Prompting vs Fine-Tuning

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) is a popular method used for integrating new knowledge into pretrained LLMs. It involves using retrieval mechanisms such as BM25 or TF-IDF to retrieve relevant information from a knowledge source and then using this information as a prompt for the LLM to generate text. On the other hand, fine-tuning involves training the entire pretrained model on a new dataset that contains both general language data and domain-specific information. This allows the model to adapt and learn from the new data, but it can also lead to overfitting if not done carefully. While both methods have their advantages, they also have limitations. RAG-based prompting relies heavily on retrieval mechanisms, which may not always be accurate in selecting relevant information. Fine-tuning, on the other hand, requires access to large amounts of domain-specific data and can be computationally expensive.

Introducing RAFT

In their research paper, authors propose Retrieval Augmented FineTuning (RAFT) as an alternative approach for integrating new knowledge into LLMs. RAFT combines elements of both RAG-based prompting and fine-tuning techniques while addressing their limitations. The main idea behind RAFT is to first filter out irrelevant documents using retrieval mechanisms similar to RAG-based prompting. Then instead of using retrieved information as a prompt for generation like in RAG, RAFT extracts verbatim snippets from these filtered documents and uses them as input during fine-tuning. This approach has several benefits. Firstly, by filtering out irrelevant documents before extraction, RAFT reduces noise in the extracted snippets compared to traditional RAG-based prompting methods. Secondly, by extracting verbatim snippets rather than using them as prompts for generation like in RAG-based methods, RAFT avoids potential errors introduced during text generation.

Evaluation Results

To evaluate the effectiveness of RAFT compared to traditional methods such as BM25-RAG (RAG with BM25 retrieval mechanism), authors conducted experiments on two datasets - Natural Questions (NQ) and HotpotQA - that require reasoning capabilities. The results showed that RAFT outperformed BM25-RAG on both datasets, achieving a 6.7% and 2.4% improvement in F1 score for NQ and HotpotQA respectively. This demonstrates the effectiveness of RAFT in enhancing reasoning capabilities within specific domains.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the research paper "Retrieval Augmented FineTuning: Improving Knowledge Integration in Large Language Models" presents a novel training recipe called RAFT for integrating new knowledge into pretrained LLMs. By combining elements of RAG-based prompting and fine-tuning techniques, RAFT addresses their limitations and shows promising results in enhancing reasoning capabilities within specific domains. This approach has potential applications in various fields such as news generation, question-answering, and language translation where incorporating new knowledge is crucial for accurate and relevant outputs. Further research can explore the use of different retrieval mechanisms or fine-tuning strategies to improve the performance of RAFT even further.

Created on 18 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.