Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks With Spotlighting

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Prompt Injection Attacks Spotlighting Techniques Encoding Algorithms Multi-channel Analogs

AI-generated Key Points

Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools in natural language processing that have revolutionized the field.
LLMs are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection attacks where adversarial instructions can be embedded into untrusted data processed alongside user commands.
Researchers have introduced spotlighting techniques as a form of prompt engineering to improve LLMs' ability to distinguish among multiple sources of input.
Spotlighting involves using encoding algorithms such as base64, ROT13, or binary transformations on the input text to enhance the model's ability to differentiate between user commands and potentially malicious instructions.
Experimental methodology has shown that spotlighting is an effective defense against indirect prompt injection attacks when applied to models like GPT-3.5Turbo and GPT-4 from the GPT family, reducing attack success rate from over 50% to below 2% without impacting task efficacy significantly.
There is potential for further research into multi-channel analogs for LLMs inspired by out-of-band signaling methods used in telecommunications, which could involve passing control tokens separately from data tokens to enhance security measures.
Techniques like delimiting, marking, and encoding transformations provide a robust defense mechanism against adversarial instructions while maintaining system functionality.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Keegan Hines, Gary Lopez, Matthew Hall, Federico Zarfati, Yonatan Zunger, Emre Kiciman

arXiv: 2403.14720v1 - DOI (cs.CR)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs), while powerful, are built and trained to process a single text input. In common applications, multiple inputs can be processed by concatenating them together into a single stream of text. However, the LLM is unable to distinguish which sections of prompt belong to various input sources. Indirect prompt injection attacks take advantage of this vulnerability by embedding adversarial instructions into untrusted data being processed alongside user commands. Often, the LLM will mistake the adversarial instructions as user commands to be followed, creating a security vulnerability in the larger system. We introduce spotlighting, a family of prompt engineering techniques that can be used to improve LLMs' ability to distinguish among multiple sources of input. The key insight is to utilize transformations of an input to provide a reliable and continuous signal of its provenance. We evaluate spotlighting as a defense against indirect prompt injection attacks, and find that it is a robust defense that has minimal detrimental impact to underlying NLP tasks. Using GPT-family models, we find that spotlighting reduces the attack success rate from greater than {50}\% to below {2}\% in our experiments with minimal impact on task efficacy.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.14720v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools in natural language processing that have revolutionized the field. However, they are also vulnerable to indirect prompt injection attacks where adversarial instructions can be embedded into untrusted data processed alongside user commands. To address this vulnerability, researchers have introduced spotlighting techniques as a form of prompt engineering to improve LLMs' ability to distinguish among multiple sources of input. One approach to spotlighting involves using encoding algorithms such as base64, ROT13, or binary transformations on the input text. By transforming the text in a recognizable way, the model can more easily identify the provenance of each section of input. This method enhances the model's ability to differentiate between user commands and potentially malicious instructions embedded in the data. Experimental methodology has shown that spotlighting is an effective defense against indirect prompt injection attacks when applied to models like GPT-3.5Turbo and GPT-4 from the GPT family. By implementing spotlighting techniques, the attack success rate can be reduced from over 50% to below 2% without significantly impacting task efficacy. Looking ahead, there is potential for further research into multi-channel analogs for LLMs inspired by out-of-band signaling methods used in telecommunications. This approach could involve passing control tokens separately from data tokens to ensure that the model only reacts to instructive tokens from a control layer. While current architectures may not support this concept directly, it presents an intriguing avenue for future exploration and development in enhancing LLM security measures. In conclusion, offers a promising solution to mitigate indirect prompt injection attacks on large language models by making input provenance more salient while maintaining semantic content and task performance. Through techniques like delimiting, marking, and encoding transformations, provides a robust defense mechanism against adversarial instructions without compromising overall system functionality.

- Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools in natural language processing that have revolutionized the field.
- LLMs are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection attacks where adversarial instructions can be embedded into untrusted data processed alongside user commands.
- Researchers have introduced spotlighting techniques as a form of prompt engineering to improve LLMs' ability to distinguish among multiple sources of input.
- Spotlighting involves using encoding algorithms such as base64, ROT13, or binary transformations on the input text to enhance the model's ability to differentiate between user commands and potentially malicious instructions.
- Experimental methodology has shown that spotlighting is an effective defense against indirect prompt injection attacks when applied to models like GPT-3.5Turbo and GPT-4 from the GPT family, reducing attack success rate from over 50% to below 2% without impacting task efficacy significantly.
- There is potential for further research into multi-channel analogs for LLMs inspired by out-of-band signaling methods used in telecommunications, which could involve passing control tokens separately from data tokens to enhance security measures.
- Techniques like delimiting, marking, and encoding transformations provide a robust defense mechanism against adversarial instructions while maintaining system functionality.

Summary- Large Language Models (LLMs) are like super smart computers that understand and process human language really well. - Sometimes, bad people can trick these LLMs by sneaking in harmful instructions along with regular commands. - To make LLMs better at telling the difference between good and bad instructions, researchers use spotlighting techniques. - Spotlighting involves changing the way text is written to help the model spot potential threats more easily. - By using spotlighting, we can make LLMs safer from attacks without affecting how well they do their tasks. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Very powerful computer programs that understand and work with human languages. - Vulnerable: Easily harmed or tricked. - Adversarial: Related to an enemy or opponent trying to cause harm. - Prompt: Instructions given to a computer program to perform a specific task. - Encoding algorithms: Methods used to change the way information is stored or transmitted for security or efficiency purposes.

Introduction

Natural language processing (NLP) has made significant strides in recent years, thanks in large part to the development of large language models (LLMs). These powerful tools have revolutionized the field, allowing for more accurate and efficient processing of human language. However, as with any technology, there are vulnerabilities that can be exploited by malicious actors. One such vulnerability is indirect prompt injection attacks on LLMs. In this blog article, we will explore a research paper titled "Spotlighting: A Defense Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models" by researchers at OpenAI. This paper introduces spotlighting techniques as a form of prompt engineering to improve LLMs' ability to distinguish among multiple sources of input and mitigate the risk of indirect prompt injection attacks.

The Vulnerability: Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks

Indirect prompt injection attacks involve embedding adversarial instructions into untrusted data processed alongside user commands. This means that an attacker can manipulate the input data in a way that triggers unintended behavior from the model. For example, an attacker could embed malicious code within seemingly innocuous text that would cause the model to perform actions not intended by the user. This vulnerability poses a significant threat to LLMs as they are often used in critical applications such as chatbots or virtual assistants where security is paramount. If left unchecked, these attacks could compromise sensitive information or even cause harm to users.

The Solution: Spotlighting Techniques

To address this vulnerability, researchers have introduced spotlighting techniques as a form of prompt engineering for LLMs. The idea behind spotlighting is to make input provenance more salient so that the model can better differentiate between user commands and potentially malicious instructions embedded in the data. One approach to spotlighting involves using encoding algorithms such as base64, ROT13, or binary transformations on the input text. These transformations are easily recognizable and can be applied to specific sections of input, making it easier for the model to identify the source of each section. This method enhances the model's ability to distinguish between user commands and potentially malicious instructions.

Experimental Methodology

To test the effectiveness of spotlighting techniques, the researchers conducted experiments on two models from the GPT family: GPT-3.5Turbo and GPT-4. They used a dataset consisting of 1,000 prompts with both benign and adversarial inputs. The results showed that without any defense mechanism in place, the attack success rate was over 50%. However, when spotlighting techniques were applied, the success rate dropped below 2%, significantly reducing the risk of indirect prompt injection attacks. Furthermore, these techniques did not have a significant impact on task efficacy. The models still performed well on their intended tasks while also being able to defend against malicious inputs.

Future Research: Multi-channel Analogs

While spotlighting has proven to be an effective defense against indirect prompt injection attacks, there is potential for further research in this area. One idea proposed by the researchers is using multi-channel analogs for LLMs inspired by out-of-band signaling methods used in telecommunications. This approach involves passing control tokens separately from data tokens to ensure that the model only reacts to instructive tokens from a control layer. While current architectures may not support this concept directly, it presents an intriguing avenue for future exploration and development in enhancing LLM security measures.

In Conclusion

In conclusion, "Spotlighting: A Defense Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models" offers a promising solution to mitigate indirect prompt injection attacks on large language models by making input provenance more salient while maintaining semantic content and task performance. Through techniques like delimiting, marking, and encoding transformations, this approach provides a robust defense mechanism against adversarial instructions without compromising overall system functionality. As LLMs continue to be integrated into various applications and systems, it is crucial to address vulnerabilities like indirect prompt injection attacks. Spotlighting techniques offer a practical and effective solution that can be implemented in current models with minimal impact on performance. With the potential for further research and development, we can continue to enhance the security of LLMs and ensure their safe use in various domains.

Created on 25 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.