Simple Techniques for Enhancing Sentence Embeddings in Generative Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Natural Language Processing Sentence Embedding Pre-trained Language Models Prompt Engineering Generative Language Models

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Sentence embedding is crucial in Natural Language Processing applications like search engines, expert systems, and question-and-answer platforms.
  • Recent advancements in sentence embedding research are driven by large language models such as LLaMA and Mistral, leading to significant breakthroughs.
  • Most developments have focused on fine-tuning scenarios rather than exploring computationally efficient direct inference methods for sentence representation.
  • The paper challenges the belief in the necessity of an Explicit One-word Limitation when deriving sentence embeddings from Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs).
  • The authors demonstrate that this limitation may not be essential for discriminative models or when fine-tuning generative PLMs, opening up new possibilities for designing manual templates.
  • Two innovative prompt engineering techniques – Pretended Chain of Thought and Knowledge Enhancement – are proposed to enhance the expressive power of PLMs' raw embeddings.
  • Comprehensive experimentation confirms the effectiveness of these techniques across various PLM types and explores factors contributing to their success.
  • The study sheds new light on optimizing sentence embeddings in generative language models and provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in Natural Language Processing.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Bowen Zhang, Kehua Chang, Chunping Li

Accepted by ICIC 2024 (Oral)

Abstract: Sentence Embedding stands as a fundamental task within the realm of Natural Language Processing, finding extensive application in search engines, expert systems, and question-and-answer platforms. With the continuous evolution of large language models such as LLaMA and Mistral, research on sentence embedding has recently achieved notable breakthroughs. However, these advancements mainly pertain to fine-tuning scenarios, leaving explorations into computationally efficient direct inference methods for sentence representation in a nascent stage. This paper endeavors to bridge this research gap. Through comprehensive experimentation, we challenge the widely held belief in the necessity of an Explicit One-word Limitation for deriving sentence embeddings from Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs). We demonstrate that this approach, while beneficial for generative models under direct inference scenario, is not imperative for discriminative models or the fine-tuning of generative PLMs. This discovery sheds new light on the design of manual templates in future studies. Building upon this insight, we propose two innovative prompt engineering techniques capable of further enhancing the expressive power of PLMs' raw embeddings: Pretended Chain of Thought and Knowledge Enhancement. We confirm their effectiveness across various PLM types and provide a detailed exploration of the underlying factors contributing to their success.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Apr. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2404.03921v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of Natural Language Processing, sentence embedding plays a crucial role in various applications such as search engines, expert systems, and question-and-answer platforms. Recent advancements in research on sentence embedding have been driven by the evolution of large language models like LLaMA and Mistral, leading to significant breakthroughs. However, most of these developments have focused on fine-tuning scenarios while neglecting the exploration of computationally efficient direct inference methods for sentence representation. This paper aims to fill this gap by challenging the conventional belief in the necessity of an Explicit One-word Limitation when deriving sentence embeddings from Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs). The authors demonstrate that while this limitation may be beneficial for generative models in direct inference scenarios, it is not essential for discriminative models or when fine-tuning generative PLMs. This finding opens up new possibilities for designing manual templates in future studies. Building on this insight, the authors propose two innovative prompt engineering techniques – Pretended Chain of Thought and Knowledge Enhancement – to further enhance the expressive power of PLMs' raw embeddings. Through comprehensive experimentation across various PLM types, they confirm the effectiveness of these techniques and provide a detailed exploration of the underlying factors contributing to their success. Overall, this study sheds new light on optimizing sentence embeddings in generative language models and offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working in the field of Natural Language Processing.
Created on 04 Jan. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.