Bayesian NeRF: Quantifying Uncertainty with Volume Density in Neural Radiance Fields

AI-generated keywords: Bayesian NeRF Uncertainty Quantification Geometric Volume Structures Real-World Environments RGB and Depth Images

AI-generated Key Points

  • Lee et al. introduce Bayesian NeRF as a method for quantifying uncertainty in geometric volume structures without additional networks
  • The approach renders color and density in 3D space from multiple viewpoints, making it suitable for challenging observations and uncontrolled images
  • NeRF faces limitations in relaxing uncertainties using only geometric structure information, leading to inaccuracies with insufficient real-world observations
  • Lee et al. propose formulational extensions to NeRF to enhance performance by introducing generalized approximations and defining density-related uncertainty
  • Their method manages uncertainty for both RGB and depth without needing extra networks or empirical assumptions
  • Experiments on a comprehensive dataset show significant performance improvements on both RGB and depth images
  • Bayesian NeRF showcases reliability in quantifying uncertainty based on geometric structure, especially important for physical occlusions and errors in sensor data
  • Incorporating uncertainty considerations highlights the importance of precise interpretation and adaptation to variability encountered in real-world environments
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sibeak Lee, Kyeongsu Kang, Hyeonwoo Yu

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We present the Bayesian Neural Radiance Field (NeRF), which explicitly quantifies uncertainty in geometric volume structures without the need for additional networks, making it adept for challenging observations and uncontrolled images. NeRF diverges from traditional geometric methods by offering an enriched scene representation, rendering color and density in 3D space from various viewpoints. However, NeRF encounters limitations in relaxing uncertainties by using geometric structure information, leading to inaccuracies in interpretation under insufficient real-world observations. Recent research efforts aimed at addressing this issue have primarily relied on empirical methods or auxiliary networks. To fundamentally address this issue, we propose a series of formulational extensions to NeRF. By introducing generalized approximations and defining density-related uncertainty, our method seamlessly extends to manage uncertainty not only for RGB but also for depth, without the need for additional networks or empirical assumptions. In experiments we show that our method significantly enhances performance on RGB and depth images in the comprehensive dataset, demonstrating the reliability of the Bayesian NeRF approach to quantifying uncertainty based on the geometric structure.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Apr. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2404.06727v1

In their paper "Bayesian NeRF: Quantifying Uncertainty with Volume Density in Neural Radiance Fields," Lee et al. introduce the Bayesian Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) as a method for explicitly quantifying uncertainty in geometric volume structures without the need for additional networks. This approach is particularly well-suited for handling challenging observations and uncontrolled images by providing a rich scene representation that renders color and density in 3D space from multiple viewpoints. However, the authors note that NeRF faces limitations in relaxing uncertainties using only geometric structure information, which can lead to inaccuracies when interpreting insufficient real-world observations. To address this issue, recent research efforts have primarily relied on empirical methods or auxiliary networks. In response, Lee et al. propose a series of formulational extensions to NeRF that aim to enhance its performance by introducing generalized approximations and defining density-related uncertainty. One key aspect of their proposed method is its ability to manage uncertainty not only for RGB but also for depth without requiring additional networks or empirical assumptions. Through experiments conducted on a comprehensive dataset, the authors demonstrate that their approach significantly improves performance on both RGB and depth images. This showcases the reliability of the Bayesian NeRF approach in quantifying uncertainty based on geometric structure. The authors emphasize the importance of considering uncertainty in neural radiance fields, especially when dealing with physical occlusions and errors inherent in real-world sensor data. By incorporating uncertainty considerations into their methodology, Lee et al. highlight the significance of precise interpretation and adaptation to variability encountered in real-world environments. Overall, this refined summary provides a detailed overview of how Lee et al. 's Bayesian NeRF approach addresses uncertainties in geometric volume structures and enhances performance in handling RGB and depth images within complex real-world scenarios.
Created on 25 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.