Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2404.11584v1

This survey paper explores emerging AI agent architectures for reasoning, planning, and tool calling. It focuses on recent advancements in AI agent implementations that aim to achieve complex goals by enhancing reasoning, planning, and tool execution capabilities. The primary objectives are to communicate current capabilities and limitations of existing AI agents, share insights from observations of these systems in action, and suggest important considerations for future developments in their design. The authors provide overviews of both single-agent and multi-agent architectures, identifying key patterns and divergences in design choices and evaluating their overall impact on accomplishing a given goal. Key themes when selecting an agentic architecture are outlined, along with discussions on the impact of leadership on agent systems, communication styles between agents, and key phases for planning, execution, and reflection that enable robust AI agent systems. The paper delves into the debate within the research community regarding whether single or multi-agent systems are better suited for solving complex tasks. While single-agent architectures excel in well-defined problems where feedback from other agents or users is not necessary, multi-agent architectures thrive in scenarios requiring collaboration and multiple distinct execution paths. Furthermore,<DateTime> importance of employing a "criticize-reflect" step for generating plans,<DateTime> evaluating performance,<DateTime> providing feedback,<DateTime> and re-organizing teams is emphasized. Results indicate that agents with dynamic team structures featuring rotating leadership deliver superior performance with lower time to task completion<DateTime> communication costs on average.<DateTime> Ultimately,<DateTime> leadership<DateTime> dynamic team structures enhance the overall team's ability to reason,<DateTime> plan effectively<DateTime>, <DateTime>and perform tasks efficiently.

• - The survey paper explores emerging AI agent architectures for reasoning, planning, and tool calling.
• - Recent advancements in AI agent implementations aim to enhance reasoning, planning, and tool execution capabilities to achieve complex goals.
• - The paper discusses current capabilities and limitations of existing AI agents, shares insights from observations of these systems in action, and suggests important considerations for future developments in their design.
• - Overviews of both single-agent and multi-agent architectures are provided, identifying key patterns and divergences in design choices and evaluating their impact on accomplishing goals.
• - Key themes when selecting an agentic architecture are outlined, including the impact of leadership on agent systems, communication styles between agents, and key phases for planning, execution, and reflection that enable robust AI agent systems.
• - There is a debate within the research community regarding whether single or multi-agent systems are better suited for solving complex tasks. Single-agent architectures excel in well-defined problems while multi-agent architectures thrive in scenarios requiring collaboration.
• - Employing a "criticize-reflect" step for generating plans, evaluating performance, providing feedback, and reorganizing teams is emphasized.
• - Agents with dynamic team structures featuring rotating leadership deliver superior performance with lower time to task completion and communication costs on average. Leadership and dynamic team structures enhance the overall team's ability to reason effectively plan efficiently.

Summary- The paper talks about new ways that smart computer programs (AI agents) can think, plan, and use tools. - These AI agents are getting better at thinking, planning, and using tools to do difficult tasks. - It also looks at what these AI agents can currently do well and what they struggle with. It gives ideas for how to make them even better in the future. - The paper compares different ways of designing these AI agents, whether having one or many working together is best for different tasks. - It mentions important things to think about when choosing how these AI agents should work together. Definitions- AI agent: A smart computer program that can think and make decisions on its own. - Reasoning: Thinking logically to solve problems or make decisions. - Planning: Figuring out steps to achieve a goal before taking action. - Tool calling: Using tools or resources to help accomplish tasks efficiently.

Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Comprehensive Survey Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been a rapidly growing field in recent years, with advancements in machine learning and deep learning algorithms enabling machines to perform complex tasks with human-like intelligence. However, the ability to reason, plan, and execute actions towards achieving a specific goal is still a major challenge for AI agents. In this survey paper, we explore the latest developments in AI agent architectures that aim to enhance reasoning, planning, and tool execution capabilities. The primary objective of this paper is to provide an overview of current capabilities and limitations of existing AI agents while sharing insights from observations of these systems in action. Additionally, we aim to suggest important considerations for future developments in their design. The authors focus on both single-agent and multi-agent architectures, identifying key patterns and divergences in design choices, evaluating their overall impact on accomplishing a given goal. Single-Agent vs Multi-Agent Architectures One of the key debates within the research community is whether single or multi-agent systems are better suited for solving complex tasks. Single-agent architectures excel in well-defined problems where feedback from other agents or users is not necessary. On the other hand, multi-agent architectures thrive in scenarios requiring collaboration and multiple distinct execution paths. In single-agent architectures, all decision-making processes are centralized within one agent. This allows for efficient planning as there is no need for communication between different agents or team members. However, it also limits adaptability as the system relies solely on its own knowledge base without input from external sources. Multi-agent architectures,on the other hand, distribute decision-making among multiple agents who can communicate with each other.This enables them to handle more complex tasks by leveraging collective intelligence through collaboration.In such systems< DateTime>, leadership plays a crucial role in coordinating actions and ensuring effective communication between agents. Key Themes in Selecting an Agentic Architecture When selecting an AI agent architecture, there are several key themes to consider. These include the impact of leadership on agent systems, communication styles between agents, and key phases for planning, execution, and reflection that enable robust AI agent systems. Leadership plays a critical role in multi-agent architectures as it determines how decisions are made and communicated among team members. Dynamic team structures with rotating leadership have been found to enhance performance by allowing different agents to take on leadership roles based on their strengths and expertise. This also promotes adaptability as the system can quickly adjust its strategy based on changing circumstances. Effective communication is another essential aspect of multi-agent architectures. Different communication styles such as direct or indirect messaging can significantly impact the efficiency of decision-making processes within a team. Agents must be able to communicate effectively with each other while avoiding conflicts or misunderstandings. Furthermore, incorporating a "criticize-reflect" step in the planning process has been found to improve performance significantly.This involves evaluating plans before execution, providing feedback during execution,< DateTime>, < DateTime >and reorganizing teams if necessary< DateTime>. This allows for continuous improvement and adaptation towards achieving the desired goal. Results from various studies indicate that dynamic team structures featuring rotating leadership deliver superior performance with lower time to task completion, < DateTime >communication costs on average. This highlights the importance of considering these factors when designing AI agent architectures for complex tasks. Conclusion In conclusion, this survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of emerging AI agent architectures for reasoning, planning, and tool calling. It highlights the differences between single-agent and multi-agent architectures while emphasizing their respective strengths and weaknesses. The importance of considering key themes such as leadership, communication styles, and effective planning phases is also discussed. Ultimately, dynamic team structures with rotating leadership have been found to enhance the overall team's ability to reason, plan effectively, and perform tasks efficiently. As AI continues to advance, further research in this area will be crucial for developing robust and adaptable AI agent architectures that can handle complex tasks with ease.