GenAI Distortion: The Effect of GenAI Fluency and Positive Affect
Authors: Xiantong Yang, Mengmeng Zhang
Abstract: The introduction of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into educational practices has been transformative, yet it brings a crucial concern about the potential distortion of users' beliefs. Given the prevalence of GenAI among college students, examining the psychological mechanisms that lead to GenAI distortion from both technological factors and the individual's psychological processes is a critical priority. A mixed-methods approach is employed to test the proposed hypotheses. Study 1 (N = 10) revealed through qualitative analysis that GenAI's fluent outputs significantly engaged college students, eliciting positive emotional responses during an interaction. GenAI's tendency to conflate fact with fiction often led to presentations of unrealistic and exaggerated information, potentially distorting users' perceptions of reality-a phenomenon termed GenAI distortion. Following these insights, Study 2 (cross-sectional survey, N = 999) and Study 3 (experimental manipulation, N = 175) explored how GenAI fluency affects college students' GenAI distortion and examined the mediating effect of positive affect. The results indicated that GenAI fluency predicts GenAI distortion via the mediating role of positive affect. Our findings provide theoretical foundations and practical implications for understanding GenAI distortion among college students.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.