Logical Error Rates for a [[4,2,2]]-Encoded Variational Quantum Eigensolver Ansatz

Authors: Meenambika Gowrishankar, Daniel Claudino, Jerimiah Wright, Travis Humble

arXiv: 2405.03032v1 - DOI (quant-ph)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Application benchmarks that run on noisy, intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing devices require techniques for mitigating errors to improve accuracy and precision. Quantum error detection codes offer a framework by which to encode quantum computations and identify when errors occur. However, the subsequent logical error rate depends on the encoded application circuit as well as the underlying noise. Here, we quantify how the [[4,2,2]] quantum error detection code improves the logical error rate, accuracy, and precision of an encoded variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) application. We benchmark the performance of the encoded VQE for estimating the energy of the hydrogen molecule with a chemical accuracy of 1.6 mHa while managing the trade-off between probability of success of various post-selection methods. Using numerical simulation of the noisy mixed state preparation, we find that the most aggressive post-selection strategies improve the accuracy and precision of the encoded estimates even at the cost of increasing loss of samples.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 May. 2024

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2405.03032v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.