, , , ,
The Intent Management Function (IMF) is a crucial component of future-generation networks, with recent advancements focusing on AI-based IMFs that can handle conflicting intents and prioritize global objectives based on predefined utility functions and priorities. Previous works have utilized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) techniques with AdHoc Teaming (AHT) approaches for efficient conflict resolution in IMF. However, the adaptability of such frameworks to evolving business scenarios is essential for real-life deployment. This paper introduces a novel mechanism that enables IMF to generalize to different forms of utility functions and adjust intent priorities at runtime without requiring additional training. This flexibility is vital in dynamic network environments where customer intents and priorities frequently change. Experimental results on a network emulator demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, showcasing scalability for new intents and outperforming existing techniques that necessitate additional training for similar levels of flexibility. In Experiment 5, the scalability of the proposed method is tested by increasing instances and action spaces within URLLC and mIoT services. The introduction of actions like Move-UE-context, which optimizes latency by shifting serving instances between nodes, and Auto-Scale Limits, which control the number of pods available for scaling applications, allows agents to manage latency and power consumption efficiently. Power optimization becomes crucial for mIoT services due to their large device count, with considerations given to energy costs at central versus edge sites. The proposed methodology includes a supervisor agent assigning sub-goals to lower-level agents based on performance observations, global goals derived from intents, and utility context updates. Different types of lower-level agents are employed, including priority MARL systems for unique packet priorities, MBR MARL systems for adjusting Max Bit rate, Move-UE-context systems for latency optimization, and single RL agents. These contributions enhance the existing literature by providing a comprehensive framework for flexible intent management in dynamic network environments. Overall, this paper highlights the innovative approach taken in enabling IMF generalization without additional training requirements while emphasizing its practical applicability in addressing evolving customer needs within modern networks.
- - The Intent Management Function (IMF) is crucial for future-generation networks
- - Recent advancements focus on AI-based IMFs that can handle conflicting intents and prioritize global objectives
- - Previous works utilized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) techniques with AdHoc Teaming (AHT) approaches for conflict resolution in IMF
- - This paper introduces a novel mechanism enabling IMF to generalize to different utility functions and adjust intent priorities at runtime without additional training
- - Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, showcasing scalability for new intents and outperforming existing techniques
- - Actions like Move-UE-context and Auto-Scale Limits are introduced to manage latency and power consumption efficiently in services like URLLC and mIoT
- - Different types of lower-level agents are employed, enhancing the framework for flexible intent management in dynamic network environments
Summary1. The Intent Management Function (IMF) is important for future networks.
2. New advancements use AI-based IMF to handle conflicting intents and prioritize goals.
3. Past works used Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) with AdHoc Teaming (AHT) for conflict resolution in IMF.
4. A new mechanism allows IMF to adapt to different functions and change intent priorities without extra training.
5. Tests show this approach works well, handling new intents and performing better than old methods.
Definitions- Intent Management Function (IMF): a crucial part of future networks that helps manage goals and conflicts.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI): technology that enables machines to learn from data and make decisions like humans.
- Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL): a technique where multiple agents learn together through rewards and actions in an environment.
- AdHoc Teaming (AHT): an approach where agents work together temporarily for specific tasks without prior coordination.
- Generalize: the ability to apply knowledge or skills to different situations or problems effectively.
- Utility functions: mathematical functions that measure preferences or satisfaction levels of outcomes.
- Runtime: the period when a program or system is running and executing tasks.
- Experimental results: outcomes obtained from tests conducted in controlled settings to evaluate performance or effectiveness.
- Scalability: the capability of a system to handle growth or increased demands efficiently over time.
Title: "Flexibility and Adaptability in Intent Management Function for Future-Generation Networks"
Introduction:
The Intent Management Function (IMF) plays a crucial role in future-generation networks, with recent advancements focusing on AI-based IMFs to handle conflicting intents and prioritize global objectives. However, the adaptability of such frameworks to evolving business scenarios is essential for real-life deployment. This research paper introduces a novel mechanism that enables IMF to generalize to different forms of utility functions and adjust intent priorities at runtime without requiring additional training.
Background:
Previous works have utilized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) techniques with AdHoc Teaming (AHT) approaches for efficient conflict resolution in IMF. However, these methods lack flexibility and require additional training when faced with new intents or changing priorities. This limitation hinders their practical applicability in dynamic network environments where customer needs frequently change.
Methodology:
To address this issue, the authors propose a comprehensive framework that includes a supervisor agent assigning sub-goals to lower-level agents based on performance observations, global goals derived from intents, and utility context updates. Different types of lower-level agents are employed, including priority MARL systems for unique packet priorities, MBR MARL systems for adjusting Max Bit rate, Move-UE-context systems for latency optimization, and single RL agents.
Results:
Experimental results on a network emulator demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach by showcasing scalability for new intents and outperforming existing techniques that necessitate additional training for similar levels of flexibility. The proposed method also shows promising results when tested with increased instances and action spaces within Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communications (URLLC) and massive Internet-of-Things (mIoT) services.
Significance:
This research paper highlights the innovative approach taken in enabling IMF generalization without additional training requirements while emphasizing its practical applicability in addressing evolving customer needs within modern networks. The flexibility provided by this methodology allows IMF to adapt quickly to changing business scenarios, making it a valuable tool for future-generation networks.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the research paper presents a novel mechanism that enables IMF to generalize and adjust intent priorities at runtime without requiring additional training. The proposed methodology showcases scalability and outperforms existing techniques in dynamic network environments. This contribution enhances the existing literature by providing a comprehensive framework for flexible intent management in future-generation networks.