Towards Adaptive IMFs -- Generalization of utility functions in Multi-Agent Frameworks

AI-generated keywords: Intent Management Function (IMF)

AI-generated Key Points

  • The Intent Management Function (IMF) is crucial for future-generation networks
  • Recent advancements focus on AI-based IMFs that can handle conflicting intents and prioritize global objectives
  • Previous works utilized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) techniques with AdHoc Teaming (AHT) approaches for conflict resolution in IMF
  • This paper introduces a novel mechanism enabling IMF to generalize to different utility functions and adjust intent priorities at runtime without additional training
  • Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, showcasing scalability for new intents and outperforming existing techniques
  • Actions like Move-UE-context and Auto-Scale Limits are introduced to manage latency and power consumption efficiently in services like URLLC and mIoT
  • Different types of lower-level agents are employed, enhancing the framework for flexible intent management in dynamic network environments
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Kaushik Dey, Satheesh K. Perepu, Abir Das, Pallab Dasgupta

Accepted in Netsoft-2024 conference
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Intent Management Function (IMF) is an integral part of future-generation networks. In recent years, there has been some work on AI-based IMFs that can handle conflicting intents and prioritize the global objective based on apriori definition of the utility function and accorded priorities for competing intents. Some of the earlier works use Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) techniques with AdHoc Teaming (AHT) approaches for efficient conflict handling in IMF. However, the success of such frameworks in real-life scenarios requires them to be flexible to business situations. The intent priorities can change and the utility function, which measures the extent of intent fulfilment, may also vary in definition. This paper proposes a novel mechanism whereby the IMF can generalize to different forms of utility functions and change of intent priorities at run-time without additional training. Such generalization ability, without additional training requirements, would help to deploy IMF in live networks where customer intents and priorities change frequently. Results on the network emulator demonstrate the efficacy of the approach, scalability for new intents, outperforming existing techniques that require additional training to achieve the same degree of flexibility thereby saving cost, and increasing efficiency and adaptability.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 May. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2405.07621v2

, , , , The Intent Management Function (IMF) is a crucial component of future-generation networks, with recent advancements focusing on AI-based IMFs that can handle conflicting intents and prioritize global objectives based on predefined utility functions and priorities. Previous works have utilized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) techniques with AdHoc Teaming (AHT) approaches for efficient conflict resolution in IMF. However, the adaptability of such frameworks to evolving business scenarios is essential for real-life deployment. This paper introduces a novel mechanism that enables IMF to generalize to different forms of utility functions and adjust intent priorities at runtime without requiring additional training. This flexibility is vital in dynamic network environments where customer intents and priorities frequently change. Experimental results on a network emulator demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, showcasing scalability for new intents and outperforming existing techniques that necessitate additional training for similar levels of flexibility. In Experiment 5, the scalability of the proposed method is tested by increasing instances and action spaces within URLLC and mIoT services. The introduction of actions like Move-UE-context, which optimizes latency by shifting serving instances between nodes, and Auto-Scale Limits, which control the number of pods available for scaling applications, allows agents to manage latency and power consumption efficiently. Power optimization becomes crucial for mIoT services due to their large device count, with considerations given to energy costs at central versus edge sites. The proposed methodology includes a supervisor agent assigning sub-goals to lower-level agents based on performance observations, global goals derived from intents, and utility context updates. Different types of lower-level agents are employed, including priority MARL systems for unique packet priorities, MBR MARL systems for adjusting Max Bit rate, Move-UE-context systems for latency optimization, and single RL agents. These contributions enhance the existing literature by providing a comprehensive framework for flexible intent management in dynamic network environments. Overall, this paper highlights the innovative approach taken in enabling IMF generalization without additional training requirements while emphasizing its practical applicability in addressing evolving customer needs within modern networks.
Created on 29 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.