Magnetospheric origin of a fast radio burst constrained using scintillation
AI-generated Key Points
- Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are brief and mysterious radio emissions mostly from extragalactic sources.
- Two main classes of models proposed for the mechanism behind FRBs: one involving physical processes near a central engine, and the other suggesting energy released from a central engine interacting with surrounding media.
- Models have different emission region sizes, which can help distinguish between them based on observed constraints.
- Recent study of FRB 20221022A measured two coherent scintillation scales in its frequency spectrum, attributed to scattering screens in Milky Way galaxy and FRB's host galaxy or local environment.
- Lateral emission region size determined to be less than approximately 30,000 kilometers, supporting an emission process occurring within or just beyond the magnetosphere of a central compact object.
- Observations showing S-shaped polarisation angle swing align with a magnetospheric emission process for FRB 20221022A.
- Scintillation results provide independent support for conclusions and highlight scintillation as a valuable tool in understanding FRB emission physics and their progenitors.
Authors: Kenzie Nimmo, Ziggy Pleunis, Paz Beniamini, Pawan Kumar, Adam E. Lanman, D. Z. Li, Robert Main, Mawson W. Sammons, Shion Andrew, Mohit Bhardwaj, Shami Chatterjee, Alice P. Curtin, Emmanuel Fonseca, B. M. Gaensler, Ronniy C. Joseph, Zarif Kader, Victoria M. Kaspi, Mattias Lazda, Calvin Leung, Kiyoshi W. Masui, Ryan Mckinven, Daniele Michilli, Ayush Pandhi, Aaron B. Pearlman, Masoud Rafiei-Ravandi, Ketan R. Sand, Kaitlyn Shin, Kendrick Smith, Ingrid H. Stairs
Abstract: Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are micro-to-millisecond duration radio transients that originate mostly from extragalactic distances. The emission mechanism responsible for these high luminosity, short duration transients remains debated. The models are broadly grouped into two classes: physical processes that occur within close proximity to a central engine; and central engines that release energy which moves to large radial distances and subsequently interacts with surrounding media producing radio waves. The expected emission region sizes are notably different between these two types of models. FRB emission size constraints can therefore be used to distinguish between these competing models and inform on the physics responsible. Here we present the measurement of two mutually coherent scintillation scales in the frequency spectrum of FRB 20221022A: one originating from a scattering screen located within the Milky Way, and the second originating from a scattering screen located within its host galaxy or local environment. We use the scattering media as an astrophysical lens to constrain the size of the lateral emission region, $R_{\star\mathrm{obs}} \lesssim 3\times10^{4}$ km. We find that this is inconsistent with the expected emission sizes for the large radial distance models, and is more naturally explained with an emission process that operates within or just beyond the magnetosphere of a central compact object. Recently, FRB 20221022A was found to exhibit an S-shaped polarisation angle swing, supporting a magnetospheric emission process. The scintillation results presented in this work independently support this conclusion, while highlighting scintillation as a useful tool in our understanding of FRB emission physics and progenitors.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.