On the Discriminability of Self-Supervised Representation Learning
AI-generated Key Points
- Recent advancements in self-supervised learning (SSL) have shown success in improving downstream visual tasks
- There is a noticeable gap between SSL and supervised learning (SL), especially in complex downstream tasks
- One key issue is the crowding problem within features learned by SSL methods, leading to lack of distinct separation between classes and high intra-class variance
- SSL objectives do not effectively constrain relationships between different samples and their augmentations, resulting in poor performance in complex tasks
- A theoretical framework highlights that the performance disparity between SSL and SL arises from SSL methods' inability to capture aggregation of similar augmentations and separation of dissimilar augmentations
- The Dynamic Semantic Adjuster (DSA) approach has been proposed as a learnable regulator to address this challenge by focusing on aggregating and separating samples while maintaining robustness to outliers
- Extensive empirical evaluations on benchmark datasets show that DSA significantly enhances feature aggregation and separation, bridging the performance gap between SSL and SL
- Researchers:
- Zeen Song, Wenwen Qiang, Changwen Zheng from University of Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, China
- Fuchun Sun from Tsinghua University in Beijing, China
- Hui Xiong from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in China
- Additional experiments were conducted to provide further insights into the issue through toy experiments related to feature learning techniques like SimCLR and BYO.
Authors: Zeen Song, Wenwen Qiang, Changwen Zheng, Fuchun Sun, Hui Xiong
Abstract: Self-supervised learning (SSL) has recently achieved significant success in downstream visual tasks. However, a notable gap still exists between SSL and supervised learning (SL), especially in complex downstream tasks. In this paper, we show that the features learned by SSL methods suffer from the crowding problem, where features of different classes are not distinctly separated, and features within the same class exhibit large intra-class variance. In contrast, SL ensures a clear separation between classes. We analyze this phenomenon and conclude that SSL objectives do not constrain the relationships between different samples and their augmentations. Our theoretical analysis delves into how SSL objectives fail to enforce the necessary constraints between samples and their augmentations, leading to poor performance in complex tasks. We provide a theoretical framework showing that the performance gap between SSL and SL mainly stems from the inability of SSL methods to capture the aggregation of similar augmentations and the separation of dissimilar augmentations. To address this issue, we propose a learnable regulator called Dynamic Semantic Adjuster (DSA). DSA aggregates and separates samples in the feature space while being robust to outliers. Through extensive empirical evaluations on multiple benchmark datasets, we demonstrate the superiority of DSA in enhancing feature aggregation and separation, ultimately closing the performance gap between SSL and SL.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.