Exploring the Roles of NLP-based Dialog Indicators in Predicting User Experience in interacting with Large Language Model System

Authors: Eason Chen

I will revise the rejected paper when I have time. More Authors TBA. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2304.10785
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The use of Large Language Models for dialogue systems is rising, presenting a new challenge: how do we assess users' chat experience in these systems? Leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP)-powered dialog analyzers to create dialog indicators like Coherence and Emotion has the potential to predict the chat experience. In this paper, we proposed a conceptual model to explain the relationship between the dialog indicators and various factors related to the chat experience, such as users' intentions, affinity toward dialog agents, and prompts of the agents' characters. We evaluated the conceptual model using PLS-SEM with 120 participants and found it well fit. Our results suggest that dialog indicators can predict the chat experience and fully mediate the impact of prompts and user intentions. Additionally, users' affinity toward agents can partially explain these predictions. Our findings demonstrate the potential of using dialog indicators in predicting the chat experience. Through the conceptual model we propose, researchers can apply the dialog analyzers to generate dialog indicators to constantly monitor the dialog process and improve the user's chat experience accordingly.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Sep. 2024

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2409.17204v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.